Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33083936›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2021

Developmental venous anomalies in patients with multiple sclerosis: is that a coincidence or an ancillary finding?

Irene Grazzini, Benedetta Calchetti, Gian Luca Cuneo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Irene GrazziniDepartment of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy. irene.grazzini@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6016-6609
Benedetta CalchettiDepartment of Cardiology-Neurology, Section of Neurology, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy.
Gian Luca CuneoDepartment of Radiology, Vesalio Institute, Grosseto, Italy.
Ospedale San Donato · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDevelopmental venous anomalies (DVAs) have been found to be more prevalent in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the study was to compare the prevalence of DVAs in a large population of patients with MS compared with controls and to investigate the correlation of 3D Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) hyperintense signal abnormalities adjacent to DVAs between MS patients and controls having DVAs, as well as DVA potential role in differential diagnosis.

methodsBetween January 2001 and December 2019, 349 patients who met the McDonald criteria for MS diagnosis (249 females, 100 males, age range 18-70 years) were retrospectively included in the study. All patients and 340 age-matched healthy controls had brain MRIs performed on a 1.5 Tesla MR system. Two radiologists reviewed all images to identify DVAs; their presence was compared between the MS and control groups. Among the subjects having DVAs, age, gender, adjacent FLAIR anomalies, and DVA location were compared between the two groups.

resultsFifty (14.3%) out 349 patients presented 51 DVAs (35 supratentorial and 16 infratentorial), in comparison to 21/340 (6.2%) controls (P = 0.0005). One patient showed 2 simultaneous DVAs, while 3 patients had coexisting pontine capillary telangiectasias. FLAIR white matter changes adjacent to DVAs were found in 46.2% of patients and in 28.1% of controls (P = 0.0001).

conclusionsDVAs demonstrated a higher prevalence in the MS group in comparison to controls. We confirmed the association between DVAs and FLAIR anomalies in MS patients. However, currently there are no evidences that the presence of DVAs may be used in MS differential diagnosis.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System Vascular MalformationsMultiple SclerosisAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultCentral nervous systemDevelopmental venous anomaliesMagnetic resonance imagingMultiple sclerosisNeuroinflammation

Identifiers

PMID33083936
OpenAlexW3094182899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.