Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33083900›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

How to minimize central line-associated bloodstream infections in a neonatal intensive care unit: a quality improvement intervention based on a retrospective analysis and the adoption of an evidence-based bundle.

Stéphanie Bierlaire, Olivier Danhaive, Katherine Carkeek, Fiammetta Piersigilli

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05246709 (Randomized Control Study to Evaluate Impact of the Use of Cyanoacrylate Glue on PICC Line Dressing Care in the Infant Cardiac Care Unit at Children's Hospital of New York), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05246709 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Control Study to Evaluate Impact of the Use of Cyanoacrylate Glue on PICC Line Dressing Care in the Infant Cardiac Care Unit at Children's Hospital of New York

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled32ConditionsCentral Line Complication, Neonatal DiseaseArmsCyanoacrylate glue, Standard transparent film dressing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stéphanie BierlaireDepartment of Neonatology, Saint-Luc University Clinics, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Olivier DanhaiveDepartment of Neonatology, Saint-Luc University Clinics, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Katherine CarkeekDepartment of Neonatology, Saint-Luc University Clinics, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Fiammetta PiersigilliDepartment of Neonatology, Saint-Luc University Clinics, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. fiammetta.piersigilli@uclouvain.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6581-2822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). A "bundle" is defined as a combination of evidence-based interventions that provided they are followed collectively and reliably, are proven to improve patient outcomes. The aim of this quasi-experimental study was to assess the impact of new central line insertion, dressing, and maintenance "bundles" on the rate of CLABSI and catheter-related complications. We performed a quality improvement (QI), prospective, before-after study. In the first 9-month period, the old "bundles" and pre-existing materials were used/applied. An intervention period then occurred with changes made to materials used and the implementation of new "bundles" related to various aspects of central lines care. A second 6-month period was then assessed and the CLABSI rates were measured in the NICU pre- and post-intervention period. The QI measures were the rate of CLABSI and catheter-related complications. Data are still being collected after the study to verify sustainability. The implementation of the new "bundles" and the change of certain materials resulted in a significantly decreased rate of CLABSI (8.4 to 1.8 infections per 1000 central venous catheter (CVC) days, p = 0.02,) as well as decreased catheter-related complications (47 to 10, p < 0.007).Conclusions: The analysis of pre-existing "bundles" and the implementation of updated central line "bundles" based on best practice recommendations are crucial for reducing the rate of CLABSI in the NICU. The implementation of the new evidence-based central line "bundles" was associated with a significant reduction in CLABSI rate in our unit soon after implementation. What is Known: • Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the neonatal population. • The implementation of evidence-based "bundles" in the NICU is associated with a reduction in the incidence of CLABSI. What is New: • For the improvement in quality care in the NICU, audits are necessary to assess the existing systems. • The "Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle" is an effective tool to use when tackling challenges in an existing system. Using this tool assisted in the approach to reducing CLABSI in our NICU.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheter-Related InfectionsCross InfectionSepsisHumansInfant, NewbornInfection ControlIntensive Care Units, NeonatalProspective StudiesQuality ImprovementRetrospective StudiesBloodstream infectionCentral venous catheterCLABSICRBSINeonateNICU

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.