Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33083884›Full record

ArticleDoklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections2020

First Data on the Contact Zone and Hybridization between the Cryptic Species of Shrews Sorex araneus and S. satunini (Eulipotyphla, Mammalia).

V V Stakheev, M A Makhotkin, O O Grigoryeva, S A Kornienko, A A Makarikov, N V Panasjuk, V N Orlov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

V V StakheevThe Southern Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 344006, Rostov-on-Don, Russia. stvaleriy@yandex.ru.
M A MakhotkinThe Southern Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 344006, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
O O GrigoryevaSevertsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071, Moscow, Russia.
S A KornienkoInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630091, Novosibirsk, Russia.
A A MakarikovInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630091, Novosibirsk, Russia.
N V PanasjukThe Southern Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 344006, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
V N OrlovSevertsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071, Moscow, Russia.
Russian Academy of Sciences · RUInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals · RUSevertsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the first time, based on sequence variation of microsatellite loci and the mtDNA cytb gene fragment, population genetic structure of the common shrew and Caucasian shrew in their contact zone was investigated. It was demonstrated that, although there was no complete reproductive isolation between the species under consideration, the gene flow was considerably limited. These data testify to the established reliable reproductive barriers between the common shrew and Caucasian shrew.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationReproductive IsolationAnimalsDNA, MitochondrialGene FlowHybridization, GeneticMicrosatellite RepeatsShrewsSpecies SpecificityDNA, MitochondrialCaucasian shrewcommon shrewcontact zonecryptic specieshybridizationreproductive isolation

Identifiers

PMID33083884
OpenAlexW3094428349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.