Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33083848›Full record

ArticleOecologia2020

Megaherbivore browsers vs. tannins: is being big enough?

Melissa H Schmitt, Adrian M Shrader, David Ward

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nutritional influences on enzyme activities in saliva of Asian and African elephants.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Melissa H SchmittSchool of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville, 3209, South Africa. Melissa.h.schmitt@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5544-7673
Adrian M ShraderSchool of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville, 3209, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6451-6132
David WardSchool of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville, 3209, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5603-6729
Kent State University · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · USUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

National Research Foundation (RSA) 90448, 97262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Megaherbivores have been of particular interest to scientists because of the physiological and ecological challenges associated with their extreme body size. Yet, one question that has seldom been explored is how browsing megaherbivores cope with plant secondary metabolites (PSMs), such as tannins, found in their food. It is possible that the sheer body size of these megaherbivores allows them to ingest tannins with no deleterious effects. However, it is plausible that megaherbivores must rely on other mechanisms to cope with PSMs, such as the production of salivary tannin-binding proteins. Thus, we aimed to determine whether megaherbivore browsers produce tannin-binding proteins to further reduce the consequences of ingesting a tannin-rich diet. Using a series of laboratory assays, we explored whether elephants, black rhinoceros, and giraffe had tannin-binding proteins in their saliva. We tested for the presence of proline-rich proteins in the saliva using two different approaches: (1) SDS-PAGE using Laemmli's (Laemmli, Nature 227:680-685, 1970) destaining method, and (2) comparative SDS-PAGE gels using Beeley et al.'s (Beeley et al. Electrophoresis 12:493-499, 1991) method for staining and destaining to probe for proline-rich proteins. Then, to test for the tannin-binding affinity of their saliva, we performed an inhibition assay. We did not observe proline-rich proteins in any of the megaherbivore species, but they did have other protein(s) in their saliva that have a high tannin-binding affinity. Our results highlight that, despite their large body sizes, and their abilities to tolerate low-quality food, browsing megaherbivores have likely evolved tannin-binding proteins as a way of coping with the negative effects of tannins.

Indexed as

Salivary Proteins and PeptidesTanninsAnimalsDietPerissodactylaSalivaSalivary Proteins and PeptidesTanninsElephantGiraffeRhinocerosSalivaTannin-binding proteins

Identifiers

PMID33083848
OpenAlexW3093963124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.