ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2020
Satisfaction with the use of telehealth during COVID-19: An integrative review.
Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 100 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
100 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 222 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of methods used for COVID-19 telehealth systems evaluation: lessons from past experiences for future use.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Role of Tele-Nursing in Reducing Bed Occupancy: A Systematic Review.Florence Nightingale journal of nursing · 2025Pooled it
- Telemedicine to Support Heart Failure Patients during Social Distancing: A Systematic Review.Global heart · 2022Pooled it
- Virtual preoperative assessment in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical anesthesia · 2021Pooled it
- A Virtual, Simulated Code White for Undergraduate Nursing Students.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2022Trial
- Therapeutic Alliance in Family-Based Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa: In-Person Versus Telehealth.Clinical psychology & psychotherapyTrial
- Examining Telemedicine Adoption After the COVID-19 Pandemic and Evaluating the Impact of a Virtual Hospital on Clinician Engagement: Longitudinal Survey Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Telehealth Use Among Older Adults Receiving Home- and Community-Based Services: Cross-Sectional Analysis Using the National Core Indicators-Aging and Disabilities Survey.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Hybrid Care Modifications in the Delivery of Nonpandemic Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Evaluating a Telemedical Follow-Up Program for Continuity of Care After Hospital Discharge: Prospective Clinical Intervention Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- The Impact of Digital Healthcare Adoption and Service Quality on Patient Satisfaction: The Moderating Role of Telehealth Services in Pakistan.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- The COVID-19 pandemic in the eyes of Polish and Slovak medical students.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Adult Digital Mental Health Tool Use From 2019-2022: Findings from the California Health Interview Survey.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2025Article
- Global Evidence on the Sustainability of Telemedicine in Outpatient and Primary Care During the First 2 Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review Using the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) Framework.Interactive journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Disparities in Telehealth Offer and Use among U.S. Adults: 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024Article
- Statistical Analysis of Telehealth Use and Pre- and Postpandemic Insurance Coverage in Selected Health Care Specialties in a Large Health Care System in Arkansas: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Gamified Mobile App (MobERAS) for Telemonitoring Patients in the Postoperative Period Based on the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program: Development and Validation Study.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2024Article
- [An Exploratory Study on Non-Contact Nursing Experiences of Clinical Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic].Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing · 2024Article
- Telemedicine and Patient Experience Ratings at an Academic Integrative Medicine Practice: Retrospective Examination.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Satisfaction of Patients and Physicians with Telehealth Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare informatics research · 2024Article
40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has defined 2020 thus far. Businesses, social and religious gatherings, travel, and almost all forms of transportation shut down to halt the spread of COVID-19. People were ordered to quarantine in place, and the world appears to go into a standstill. In the midst of being quarantined people with acute and chronic conditions still require medical care and treatment. An alternative way for people to receive needed health care was necessary. Hence, we saw an unprecedented surge in telehealth. With this unprecedented surge in use of telehealth, there is matter of delivering quality care.
objectiveGuided by the Donabedian Model, the purpose of this integrative review was to examine current evidence on patient and healthcare provider's satisfaction with the use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic.
designAn integrative review of the literature. DATA SOURCES: The literature review was conducted utilizing PubMED, CINAHL, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library databases. Inclusion criteria were studies published from January 2020 to July 11, 2020, published and translated in English language, and studies that evaluated patients and providers satisfaction with the use of telehealth or telemedicine during COVID-19. Eighteen articles were included in this review. REVIEW
methodsAn evaluation matrix was developed to collect data from the included articles. The articles were appraised using Fineout-Overholt & Gallagher-Ford Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist for Descriptive Studies and Rapid Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation or Quality Improvement Projects (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015). Authors independently appraised each article using the appropriate appraisal tools.
resultsTen of the articles (53%) included were studies conducted in the United States. Sixteen out of 18 studies evaluated patient satisfaction and five studies examined healthcare providers' satisfaction with the use of telehealth. The majority of telehealth services offered were by subspecialists. Overall, patients and healthcare providers have high level of satisfaction with the use of telehealth during COVID-19 pandemic. Many patients and healthcare providers reported willingness to continue using telehealth after the pandemic.
conclusionThis integrative review provided additional evidence on patient and healthcare provider's satisfaction with the use of telehealth. Findings in this review may not be surprising as individuals, healthcare providers, and health systems needed to adopt the use telehealth due to necessity. However, the results for telehealth are promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.