ArticleWater research X2020
CrAssphage for fecal source tracking in Chile: Covariation with norovirus, HF183, and bacterial indicators.
Article in Water research X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- CrAssphage distribution analysis in an Amazonian river based on metagenomic sequencing data and georeferencing.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Performance of Conditional Random Forest and Regression Models at Predicting Human Fecal Contamination of Produce Irrigation Ponds in the Southeastern United States.ACS ES&T water · 2024Article
- CrAss-Like Phages: From Discovery in Human Fecal Metagenome to Application as a Microbial Source Tracking Marker.Food and environmental virology · 2024Review
- Evaluation of crAssphages as a potential marker of human viral contamination in environmental water and fresh leafy greens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Tools and methodology toFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Searching for a Reliable Viral Indicator of Faecal Pollution in Aquatic Environments.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Review
- CrAssphage May Be Viable Markers of Contamination in Pristine and Contaminated River Water.mSystems · 2023Article
- Article
- Longitudinal monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater using viral genetic markers and the estimation of unconfirmed COVID-19 cases.The Science of the total environment · 2022Article
- Monitoring Human Viral Pathogens Reveals Potential Hazard for Treated Wastewater Discharge or Reuse.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Comparison of approaches to quantify SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater using RT-qPCR: Results and implications from a collaborative inter-laboratory study in Canada.Journal of environmental sciences (China) · 2021Article
- Occurrence and Accumulation of Human Enteric Viruses and Phages in Process Water from the Fresh Produce Industry.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Microbial source tracking using metagenomics and other new technologies.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2021Review
- Evaluation of Low-Cost Phage-Based Microbial Source Tracking Tools for Elucidating Human Fecal Contamination Pathways in Kolkata, India.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anthropogenic fecal pollution in urban waterbodies can promote the spread of waterborne disease. The objective of this study was to test crAssphage, a novel viral human fecal marker not previously applied for fecal source tracking in Latin America, as a fecal pollution marker in an urban river in Chile. Human fecal markers crAssphage CPQ_064 and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.