Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33083754›Full record

ArticleiScience2020

Unique Epigenetic Programming Distinguishes Regenerative Spermatogonial Stem Cells in the Developing Mouse Testis.

Keren Cheng, I-Chung Chen, Ching-Hsun Eric Cheng, Kazadi Mutoji, Benjamin J Hale, Brian P Hermann, Christopher B Geyer, Jon M Oatley, John R McCarrey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The role(s) of NF-Y in development and differentiation.Cell death and differentiation · 2025
    Review
  11. Quantitative CUT&Tag for Epigenomic Profiling of Mouse Germ Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  12. The Biology and Regulation of Spermatogonial Stem Cells in the Niche.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Epigenetic priming in the male germline.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Keren ChengDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
I-Chung ChenDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Ching-Hsun Eric ChengDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Kazadi MutojiDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Benjamin J HaleDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology at the Brody School of Medicine and East Carolina Diabetes and Obesity Institute, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Brian P HermannDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Christopher B GeyerDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology at the Brody School of Medicine and East Carolina Diabetes and Obesity Institute, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Jon M OatleyCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Molecular Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
John R McCarreyDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USEast Carolina University · USWashington State University · US

Funding

RCMI Center for Interdiscplinary Health Research CIHRG12MD007591 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI PERRY, GEORGE · 2012 to 2016
$10.4M
Mechanism Underlying the Transduction of Epimutations from the Soma to the Male GermlineP50HD098593 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI SWERDLOFF, RONALD SHERWIN · 2019 to 2024
$7.2M
Control Spermatogonial Stem Cell Fate Decisions by bHLH Transcription RegulatorsR01HD061665 · NICHD · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI OATLEY, JON M · 2009 to 2019
$3.1M
Epimutations in Offspring Produced by Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART)R01HD078679 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI MCCARREY, JOHN R, MEISSNER, ALEXANDER · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
Mechanisms of stem cell specification in the male germlineR01HD101223 · NICHD · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI OATLEY, JON M · 2020 to 2023
$2.0M
Origin and functional significance of the spermatogonial stem cell transcriptome barcodeR01HD090007 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI HERMANN, BRIAN PETER · 2017 to 2021
$1.5M
The role of retinoid exposure in specification of the foundational SSC poolR01HD090083 · NICHD · EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY · PI GEYER, CHRISTOPHER BENNETT · 2017 to 2021
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD098593NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061665NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD078679NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD090007NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD090083NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD101223NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) both self-renew and give rise to progenitors that initiate spermatogenic differentiation in the mammalian testis. Questions remain regarding the extent to which the SSC and progenitor states are functionally distinct. Here we provide the first multiparametric integrative analysis of mammalian germ cell epigenomes comparable with that done for >100 somatic cell types by the ENCODE Project. Differentially expressed genes distinguishing SSC- and progenitor-enriched spermatogonia showed distinct histone modification patterns, particularly for H3K27ac and H3K27me3. Motif analysis predicted transcription factors that may regulate spermatogonial subtype-specific fate, and immunohistochemistry and gene-specific chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses confirmed subtype-specific differences in target gene binding of a subset of these factors. Taken together, these results show that SSCs and progenitors display distinct epigenetic profiling consistent with these spermatogonial subtypes being differentially programmed to either self-renew and maintain regenerative capacity as SSCs or lose regenerative capacity and initiate lineage commitment as progenitors.

Indexed as

Developmental GeneticsOmics

Identifiers

PMID33083754
PMCPMC7552105
OpenAlexW3088307769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.