Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33083743›Full record

ArticleiScience2020

Playback of Alarm and Appetitive Calls Differentially Impacts Vocal, Heart-Rate, and Motor Response in Rats.

Krzysztof H Olszyński, Rafał Polowy, Monika Małż, Paweł M Boguszewski, Robert K Filipkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Krzysztof H OlszyńskiBehavior and Metabolism Research Laboratory, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5 Pawinskiego St, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.
Rafał PolowyBehavior and Metabolism Research Laboratory, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5 Pawinskiego St, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.
Monika MałżBehavior and Metabolism Research Laboratory, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5 Pawinskiego St, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.
Paweł M BoguszewskiLaboratory of Animal Models, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Pasteur St, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
Robert K FilipkowskiBehavior and Metabolism Research Laboratory, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5 Pawinskiego St, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our rudimentary knowledge about rat intraspecific vocal system of information exchange is limited by experimental models of communication. Rats emit 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in appetitive states and 22-kHz ones in aversive states. Both affective states influence heart rate. We propose a behavioral model employing exposure to pre-recorded playbacks in home-cage-like conditions. Fifty-kHz playbacks elicited the most vocalizations (>60 calls per minute, mostly of 50-kHz type), increased heart rate, and locomotor activity. In contrast, 22-kHz playback led to abrupt decrease in heart rate and locomotor activity. Observed effects were more pronounced in singly housed rats compared with the paired housed group; they were stronger when evoked by natural playback than by corresponding artificial tones. Finally, we also observed correlations between the number of vocalizations, heart rate levels, and locomotor activity. The correlations were especially strong in response to 50-kHz playback.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological SciencesEthology

Identifiers

PMID33083743
PMCPMC7553343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.