Reciprocal Development and Progressive Responsibility: The History of the Mayo Clinic Neurology Residency.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Surgical innovation, statistical analysis, and professional culture: thymectomy for myasthenia gravis, 1936-2016.Medical history · 2025
   Article
2. The 2022 European postgraduate (residency) programme in neurology in a historical and international perspective.European journal of neurology · 2024
   Article
3. Women in the Mayo Clinic Department of Neurology in its early years.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2022
   Article
4. Harry Lee Parker: Games Lost and Won on the Playing Fields of Neurology.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2021
   Review
5. Trainee Well-Being: More Important Than Ever.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.