Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33083659›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Reirradiation of High-Grade Gliomas: A Retrospective Analysis of 198 Patients Based on the Charité Data Set.

David Kaul, Vera Pudlitz, Dirk Böhmer, Peter Wust, Volker Budach, Arne Grün

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. New approaches to overcome radioresistance in glioblastoma: mechanisms, targets and role of innovative therapies, new particles and non-photon radiotherapy in 2024. A systematic review.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Reirradiation of gliomas with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: efficacy and tolerance analysis at a single center.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Re-irradiation for high-grade gliomas: Has anything changed?World journal of clinical oncology · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David KaulDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Vera PudlitzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Dirk BöhmerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Peter WustDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Volker BudachDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Arne GrünDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is no standard of care for recurrent high-grade glioma. Treatment strategies include reresection, reirradiation, systemic agents, intratumoral thermotherapy using magnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles ("nanotherapy"), and tumor treating fields. Only a small number of patients are eligible for reresection, and because many patients receive a full course of radiation therapy, there is fear of reirradiation-induced morbidity. Modern radiation techniques have resulted in greater acceptance of reirradiation. In this work we retrospectively analyzed patients who had undergone reirradiation of high-grade glioma at Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients treated with reirradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma in our department from January 1997 to February 2014 were analyzed in this study. In total, 198 patients were included. The primary endpoint was overall survival after recurrence.

resultsOne hundred ninety-eight patients were identified. Median time from first radiation therapy to reirradiation was 14 months. Median follow-up from the first day of reirradiation to last contact or death was 7 months. Median overall survival after relapse was 7 months for the overall cohort. For glioblastoma, median overall survival after relapse was 6 months and for grade 3 gliomas 14 months. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 toxicity was observed in 5.1% patients and grade 4 toxicity in 2.5%. No patient developed grade 5 toxicity. The likelihood of developing severe toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or 4) was not significantly higher in the group of patients who received reirradiation in the first 14 months after initial radiation therapy. Patients who received a higher biologically effective dose to the tumor also did not have a significantly higher rate of severe acute toxicity.

conclusionsThe prognosis of recurrent high-grade glioma remains dismal. Reirradiation is often tolerable even after early recurrence (<14 months) and with higher doses (eg, 49.4 Gy/3.8 Gy) in selected patients.

Identifiers

PMID33083659
PMCPMC7557122
OpenAlexW3036060593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.