Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33083571›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2020

Fusion of medical imaging and electronic health records using deep learning: a systematic review and implementation guidelines.

Shih-Cheng Huang, Anuj Pareek, Saeed Seyyedi, Imon Banerjee, Matthew P Lungren

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 326 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
326citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

326 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

266 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shih-Cheng Huang *Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9882-833X
Anuj Pareek *Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1526-3685
Saeed SeyyediCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Imon BanerjeeCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3327-8004
Matthew P LungrenDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.

Funding

Deep Learning for Pulmonary Embolism Imaging Decision Support: A Multi-institutional CollaborationR01LM012966 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHAH, NIGAM H · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in deep learning techniques carry the potential to make significant contributions to healthcare, particularly in fields that utilize medical imaging for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment decisions. The current state-of-the-art deep learning models for radiology applications consider only pixel-value information without data informing clinical context. Yet in practice, pertinent and accurate non-imaging data based on the clinical history and laboratory data enable physicians to interpret imaging findings in the appropriate clinical context, leading to a higher diagnostic accuracy, informative clinical decision making, and improved patient outcomes. To achieve a similar goal using deep learning, medical imaging pixel-based models must also achieve the capability to process contextual data from electronic health records (EHR) in addition to pixel data. In this paper, we describe different data fusion techniques that can be applied to combine medical imaging with EHR, and systematically review medical data fusion literature published between 2012 and 2020. We conducted a systematic search on PubMed and Scopus for original research articles leveraging deep learning for fusion of multimodality data. In total, we screened 985 studies and extracted data from 17 papers. By means of this systematic review, we present current knowledge, summarize important results and provide implementation guidelines to serve as a reference for researchers interested in the application of multimodal fusion in medical imaging.

Indexed as

Data integrationMachine learningMedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID33083571
PMCPMC7567861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.