ArticleNPJ digital medicine2020
Best practices for authors of healthcare-related artificial intelligence manuscripts.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of machine learning-based prognostic models for acute pancreatitis: Towards improving methods and reporting quality.PLoS medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in the risk prediction models of cardiovascular disease and development of an independent validation screening tool: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- The consensus-based CINEX guideline for reporting clinical information extraction studies.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- An analytic research and review of the literature on practice of artificial intelligence in healthcare.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Self-supervised learning for label-free segmentation in cardiac ultrasound.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A scoping review of large language model based approaches for information extraction from radiology reports.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Pitfalls in Developing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Cardiovascular Diseases: Challenge and Solutions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- The past, current, and future of neonatal intensive care units with artificial intelligence: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- Consolidated Reporting Guidelines for Prognostic and Diagnostic Machine Learning Modeling Studies: Development and Validation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Predicting Hearing Loss in Testicular Cancer Patients after Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy.Cancers · 2023Article
- Perspectives on validation of clinical predictive algorithms.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Development of a machine-learning based model for predicting multidimensional outcome after surgery for degenerative disorders of the spine.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022Article
- Assessing the Generalizability of a Clinical Machine Learning Model Across Multiple Emergency Departments.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2022Article
- Machine learning for medical imaging: methodological failures and recommendations for the future.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Review
- Analyzing Patient Trajectories With Artificial Intelligence.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Can Machine Learning Help Simplify the Measurement of Diastolic Function in Echocardiography?JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
- Deep learning on fundus images detects glaucoma beyond the optic disc.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The AIMe registry for artificial intelligence in biomedical research.Nature methods · 2021Article
- Preventing dataset shift from breaking machine-learning biomarkers.GigaScience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since its inception in 2017,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.