Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33083527›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2020

Mechanism of action biomarkers predicting response to AKT inhibition in the I-SPY 2 breast cancer trial.

Denise M Wolf, Christina Yau, Julia Wulfkuhle, Lamorna Brown-Swigart, Rosa I Gallagher, Mark Jesus M Magbanua, Nick O'Grady, Gillian Hirst, I-SPY 2 TRIAL Investigators, Smita Asare and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hormone Receptor-Positive HER2-Negative/MammaPrint High-2 Breast Cancers Closely Resemble Triple-Negative Breast Cancers.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  9. Laser capture microdissection.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  10. AKT kinases as therapeutic targets.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Denise M Wolf *University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.
Christina Yau *University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.
Julia Wulfkuhle *George Mason University, Fairfax, VA USA.
Lamorna Brown-SwigartUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.
Rosa I GallagherGeorge Mason University, Fairfax, VA USA.
Mark Jesus M MagbanuaUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2113-3593
Nick O'GradyUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.
Gillian HirstUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4502-0035
I-SPY 2 TRIAL Investigators
Smita AsareQuantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA USA.
Debu TripathyUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5711-2404
Don BerryBerry Consultants, LLC, Austin, TX USA.
Laura EssermanUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9202-4568
A Jo ChienUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.
Emanuel F PetricoinGeorge Mason University, Fairfax, VA USA.
Laura van 't VeerUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9838-8298
University of California, San Francisco · USGeorge Mason University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USQuantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative · US

Funding

Convalescent Plasma to Limit Coronavirus Associated ComplicationsUL1TR003167 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KARP, DANIEL D, MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2019 to 2023
$45.3M
The I SPY 2.2 TRIAL: Evolving to Imaging and Molecular Biomarker Response Directed Adaptive Sequential Treatment to Optimize Breast Cancer OutcomesP01CA210961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Nola M. Hylton-Watson · 2017 to 2026
$22.9M
Using Networks to Seed Hierarchical Whole-cell Models of CancerU54CA209891 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2017 to 2021
$10.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003167NCI NIH HHS P01 CA210961NCI NIH HHS U54 CA209891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The AKT inhibitor MK2206 (M) was evaluated in I-SPY 2 and graduated in the HER2+, HR-, and HR- HER2+ signatures. We hypothesized that AKT signaling axis proteins/genes may specifically predict response to M and tested 26 phospho-proteins and 10 genes involved in AKT-mTOR-HER signaling; in addition, we tested 9 genes from a previous study in the metastatic setting. One hundred and fifty patients had gene expression data from pretreatment biopsies available for analysis (M: 94, control: 56) and 138 had protein data (M: 87, control: 51). Logistic modeling was used to assess biomarker performance in pre-specified analysis. In general, phospho-protein biomarkers of activity in the AKT-mTOR-HER pathway appeared more predictive of response to M than gene expression or total protein biomarkers in the same pathway; however, the nature of the predictive biomarkers differed in the HER2+ and TN groups. In the HER2+ subset, patients achieving a pCR in M had higher levels of multiple AKT kinase substrate phospho-proteins (e.g., pmTOR, pTSC2). In contrast, in the TN subset responding patients had lower levels of AKT pathway phospho-proteins, such as pAKT, pmTOR, and pTSC2. Pathway mutations did not appear to account for these associations. Additional exploratory whole-transcriptome analysis revealed immune signaling as strongly associated with response to M in the HER2+ subset. While our sample size is small, these results suggest that the measurement of particular AKT kinase substrate phospho-proteins could be predictive of MK2206 efficacy in both HER2+ and TN tumors and that immune signaling may play a role in response in HER2+ patients.

Indexed as

Breast cancerPredictive markers

Identifiers

PMID33083527
PMCPMC7532145
OpenAlexW3089446304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.