Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33083508›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2020

Clinical and Radiographic Outcome of Gap Balancing Versus Measured Resection Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Eva De Wachter, Johan Vanlauwe, Robert Krause, Hans Bayer-Helms, Dirk Ganzer, Thierry Scheerlinck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eva De WachterDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Johan VanlauweDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Robert KrauseDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Oberlinklinik, Potsdam, Germany.
Hans Bayer-HelmsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hilden, Germany.
Dirk GanzerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Dietrich-Bonhoeffer-Klinikum, Altentreptow, Germany.
Thierry ScheerlinckDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no consensus regarding superiority between gap balancing (GB) and measured resection (MR) techniques to implant total knee arthroplasties. In a multicenter setup, we compared both techniques using the same prosthesis.

methodsWe included 262 balanSys posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties from 4 centers: 3 using the MR (n = 162) and one using the GB technique (n = 100), without navigation.

resultsThere was no significant difference in the Knee Society Score or visual analog scale pain at 2- and 7-year follow-up. The visual analog scale for satisfaction was significantly better in the MR group at 2 but not at 7 years. We found a significantly higher average valgus in the GB group, but the overall alignment was within 2° of neutral on the full-leg radiographs. There were no significant differences concerning radiolucency and survival.

conclusionsWe found no significant differences in the functional outcome, pain, alignment, or survival, but a tendency toward better function using MR and better survival with GB.

Indexed as

ArthroplastyGap balancingKnee Society ScoreMeasured resectionSurvivalTKA

Identifiers

PMID33083508
PMCPMC7551640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.