Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33083282›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2020

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy versus Sorafenib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Kazuomi Ueshima, Sadahisa Ogasawara, Masafumi Ikeda, Yutaka Yasui, Takeshi Terashima, Tatsuya Yamashita, Shuntaro Obi, Shinpei Sato, Hiroshi Aikata, Takumi Ohmura and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sorafenib Plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sorafenib with or without co-interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuomi UeshimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Sadahisa OgasawaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Masafumi IkedaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Yutaka YasuiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Musashino, Japan.
Takeshi TerashimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Tatsuya YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Shuntaro ObiThird Department of Internal Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Ichihara, Japan.
Shinpei SatoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoundo Hospital of the Sasaki Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi AikataDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Takumi OhmuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sapporo Kosei General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Hidekatsu KurodaDivision of Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
Takamasa OhkiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kengo NagashimaResearch Center for Medical and Health Data Science, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiko OokaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Masahiro TakitaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Masayuki KurosakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Musashino, Japan.
Kazuaki ChayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Shuichi KanekoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Namiki IzumiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Musashino, Japan.
Naoya KatoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Masatoshi KudoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Masao OmataYamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital, Kofu, Japan.
Chiba University · JPKindai University · JPMusashino Red Cross Hospital · JPHiroshima University Hospital · JPKanazawa University · JPSasaki Institute · JPIwate Medical University · JPKanazawa University Hospital · JPMitsui Memorial Hospital · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPSapporo Kosei General Hospital · JPThe Institute of Statistical Mathematics · JPYamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior to the approval of sorafenib, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) was offered to patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in East Asia, particularly Japan. According to the Japanese guidelines, HAIC is recommended as one of the treatment options in patients without extrahepatic metastasis (EHM).

methodsThe present cohort study compared the use of HAIC and sorafenib on outcomes of patients with advanced HCC. Consecutive patients with advanced HCC who received HAIC or sorafenib as a first-line systemic therapy were enrolled from 10 Japanese institutions. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) in patients with macrovascular invasion (MVI), but without EHM, and OS in patients without both MVI and EHM.

resultsBetween 2009 and 2016, 2,006 patients were enrolled (541 HAIC patients, 1,465 sorafenib patients). After propensity score matching, the OS of patients with MVI but without EHM was significantly longer in the HAIC group compared with the sorafenib group (10.1 vs. 9.1 months for the HAIC and sorafenib groups, respectively;

conclusionHAIC is a potential front-line treatment choice in a subpopulation of patients with advanced HCC with MVI but without EHM.

Indexed as

Advanced hepatocellular carcinomaHepatic arterial infusion chemotherapyMacrovascular invasionSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID33083282
PMCPMC7548914
OpenAlexW3045447168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.