Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33083277›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2020

A Comparison of Biannual Two-Phase Low-Dose Liver CT and US for HCC Surveillance in a Group at High Risk of HCC Development.

Jeong Hee Yoon, Jeong Min Lee, Dong Ho Lee, Ijin Joo, Ju Hyun Jeon, Su Joa Ahn, Seung-Taek Kim, Eun Ju Cho, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Su Jong Yu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of abbreviated MRI and ultrasonography in the detection of early hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Early screening for liver cancer must be performed.World journal of hepatology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeong Hee YoonRadiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Min LeeRadiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dong Ho LeeRadiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ijin JooRadiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ju Hyun JeonRadiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Su Joa AhnRadiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Taek KimRadiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eun Ju ChoInternal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeong-Hoon LeeInternal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Su Jong YuInternal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yoon Jun KimInternal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Hwan YoonInternal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsBiannual ultrasonography (US) is a current recommendation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in a high-risk group. The sensitivity of US, however, has been low in patients with a high risk of developing HCC. We aimed to compare sensitivity for HCC of biannual US and two-phase low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in patients with a high risk of HCC.

methodsIn this prospective single-arm study, participants with an annual risk of HCC greater than 5% (based on a risk index of ≥2.33) and who did not have a history of HCC were enrolled from November 2014 to July 2016. Participants underwent paired biannual US and two-phase LDCT 1-3 times. Two-phase LDCT included arterial and 3-min delayed phases. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of HCC detection using US and two-phase LDCT were compared using a composite algorithm as a standard of reference.

resultsOf the 139 enrolled participants, 137 underwent both the biannual US and two-phase LDCT at least once and had follow-up images. Among them, 27 cases of HCC (mean size: 14 ± 4 mm) developed in 24 participants over 1.5 years. Two-phase LDCT showed a significantly higher sensitivity (83.3% [20/24] vs. 29.2% [7/24],

conclusionsPatients with a risk index ≥2.33 showed a high annual incidence of HCC development in our study, and two-phase LDCT showed significantly higher sensitivity and specificity for HCC detection than US.

Indexed as

CirrhosisHepatocellular carcinomaLow-dose CTSurveillanceUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID33083277
PMCPMC7548851
OpenAlexW3048251720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.