ArticleInternational review of research in developmental disabilities2020
Feasibility and acceptability of an online response inhibition cognitive training program for youth with Williams syndrome.
Article in International review of research in developmental disabilities, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Behavioral Consequences Among Survivors of Cerebral Malaria and Acceptability to Different Disciplinary Methods.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Pilot study of the effectiveness of a telehealth group for improving peer relationships for adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Williams syndrome (WS) is a genetic neurodevelopmental disorder often accompanied by inhibitory difficulties. Online cognitive training programs show promise for improving cognitive functions. No such interventions have been developed for individuals with WS, but to explore the practicality of large-scale online cognitive training for this population, we must first investigate whether families of those with WS find these programs feasible and acceptable. Twenty individuals aged 10-17 years with WS, along with parents, participated in a pilot online cognitive training program supervised in real time using videoconference software. We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of this response inhibition training using three parent questionnaires. Descriptive data are reported for the measures of feasibility and acceptability. Overall, the online procedures received a positive reaction from families. Parents were likely to recommend the study to others. They indicated training was ethical and acceptable despite feeling neutral about effectiveness. The frequency and duration of sessions were acceptable to families (two 20-to-30-min sessions per week; 10 sessions total). Families provided feedback and offered suggestions for improvement, such as more flexibility in scheduling and decreasing time spent in review of procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.