Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33083149›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

The effectiveness of the Peyton's 4-step teaching approach on skill acquisition of procedures in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis with integrated meta-regression.

Katia Giacomino, Rahel Caliesch, Karl Martin Sattelmayer

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07530822 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect Of Prenatal Care Training Using The Peyton Model On Midwifery Students' Knowledge, Skills, Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, And Satisfaction Levels

TypeinterventionalSponsorSaglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRan2025 to 2026Enrolled64ConditionsPrenatal Care, Midwifery Education, Clinical Self-Efficacy, AnxietyArmsPeyton Model Training, Standard Training
NCT07735026 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Peyton's Four-Step Approach and Halsted's 'See One, Do One' Method for Teaching Basic Surgical Skills: A Randomised Study Assessing Long-Term Retention in a Pakistani Medical School

TypeinterventionalSponsorDow University of Health SciencesRan2025 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsRetention of Basic Surgical Skills, Surgical Skills Performance ScoreArmsHalsted's approach, Peyton's approach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Vacuum 5-step technique versus OdonAssist: Which is easier to learn for professionals without experience in assisted vaginal births? A simulation study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katia Giacomino *School of Health Sciences, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, Leukerbad, Switzerland.
Rahel CalieschSchool of Health Sciences, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, Leukerbad, Switzerland.
Karl Martin Sattelmayer *School of Health Sciences, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, Leukerbad, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcquisition of procedures is an important element in health professions education. Traditionally procedures are taught using a "see one - do one" approach. That is a teacher demonstrates and describes a procedure and afterwards the students practice the procedure. A more recent teaching approach for the acquisition of procedural skills was presented by Walker and Peyton. Peyton's teaching approach is a stepwise teaching approach and consists of the following four steps: demonstration, deconstruction, comprehension and performance. The aims of this study were (i) to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of Peyton's 4-step teaching approach on the acquisition of procedural skills in health professions education and (ii) to evaluate whether studies with fewer students per teacher showed a larger between group difference than studies with more students per teacher.

methodsWe searched in Medline, PsycInfo, Embase and ERIC for eligible studies. Records were screened by two independent reviewers. A random effects meta-analysis was performed to evaluate skill acquisition and time needed to perform the procedures at post-acquisition and retention tests. A meta-regression was used to explore the effect of the number of students per teacher on the estimated effect of the educational interventions.

resultsAn effect size of 0.45 SMD (95% CI [0.15; 0.75]) at post-acquisition and 0.7 SMD (95% CI [-0.09; 1.49]) at retention testing were in favour of Peyton's teaching approach for skill acquisition. The groups using Peyton's teaching approach needed considerably less time to perform the procedure at post-acquisition (SMD: -0.8; 95% [CI -2.13 to 1.62]) and retention (SMD: -2.65; 95% CI [-7.77 to 2.47]) testing. The effectiveness of Peyton's teaching approach was less clear in subgroup analyses using peer teachers. Meta-regression showed that the number of students per teacher was an important moderator variable.

conclusionPeyton's teaching approach is an effective teaching approach for skill acquisition of procedural skills in health professions education. When peer students or student tutors are used as teachers the effectiveness of Peyton's teaching approach is less clear. Peyton's teaching approach is more effective when small groups with few students per teacher are used.

Indexed as

Clinical competenceMotor skillsPeyton’s 4-stepProcedural skillsPsychomotor performancePublic health professional educationSee one - do one

Identifiers

PMID33083149
PMCPMC7549471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.