Are giant clams (

Ryan Doyle, Jonathan Kim, Angelika Pe, Daniel T Blumstein

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Giant clams as open-source, scalable reef environmental biomonitors.PloS one · 2023
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryan Doyle *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.

Jonathan Kim *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.

Angelika Pe *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.

Daniel T BlumsteinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To properly assess risk, an animal must focus its attention on relevant external stimuli; however, attention can be reallocated when distracting stimuli are present. This reallocation of attention may interfere with an individual's ability to effectively assess risk and may impede its response. Multiple stimuli presented together can have additive effects as distractors, and these include stimuli in different modalities. Although changes in noise and water flow are detectable by some bivalves, this has not been studied in the context of risk assessment or distraction. We experimentally exposed giant clams (

Indexed as

Anthropogenic noiseGiant clamMultimodal risk assessmentMultisensory risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID33083126

DOI10.7717/peerj.10050

PMCPMC7543721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.