Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33083100›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Fecal microbiota in client-owned obese dogs changes after weight loss with a high-fiber-high-protein diet.

Sandra Bermudez Sanchez, Rachel Pilla, Benjamin Sarawichitr, Alessandro Gramenzi, Fulvio Marsilio, Joerg M Steiner, Jonathan A Lidbury, Georgiana R T Woods, Alexander J German, Jan S Suchodolski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Exploring Gut Microbiota-Targeted Therapies for Canine Idiopathic Epilepsy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Analysis of the gut microbiome in dogs and cats.Veterinary clinical pathology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sandra Bermudez SanchezFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy.
Rachel PillaGastrointestinal Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Benjamin SarawichitrGastrointestinal Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Alessandro GramenziFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy.
Fulvio MarsilioFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy.
Joerg M SteinerGastrointestinal Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Jonathan A LidburyGastrointestinal Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Georgiana R T WoodsInstitute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Neston, United Kingdom.
Alexander J GermanInstitute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Neston, United Kingdom.
Jan S SuchodolskiGastrointestinal Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Texas A&M University · USUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Teramo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe fecal microbiota from obese individuals can induce obesity in animal models. In addition, studies in humans, animal models and dogs have revealed that the fecal microbiota of subjects with obesity is different from that of lean subjects and changes after weight loss. However, the impact of weight loss on the fecal microbiota in dogs with obesity has not been fully characterized.

methodsIn this study, we used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to investigate the differences in the fecal microbiota of 20 pet dogs with obesity that underwent a weight loss program. The endpoint of the weight loss program was individually tailored to the ideal body weight of each dog. In addition, we evaluated the qPCR based Dysbiosis Index before and after weight loss.

resultsAfter weight loss, the fecal microbiota structure of dogs with obesity changed significantly (

conclusionThe changes observed in the fecal microbiota of dogs with obesity after weight loss with a weight loss diet rich in fiber and protein were in agreement with previous studies in humans, that reported an increase of bacterial biodiversity and a decrease of the ratio Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes.

Indexed as

16S rRNACanine obesityDysbiosisFecal microbiotaWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID33083100
PMCPMC7543742
OpenAlexW3090230530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.