Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33082990›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2020

Feasibility and acceptability of a remotely-delivered behavioural health coaching intervention to limit gestational weight gain.

J W Coughlin, L M Martin, J Henderson, A T Dalcin, J Fountain, N-Y Wang, L J Appel, J M Clark, W Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

J W CoughlinDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7924-5892
L M MartinDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA.
J HendersonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA.
A T DalcinWelch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA.
J FountainDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA.
N-Y WangWelch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA.
L J AppelWelch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA.
J M ClarkWelch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA.
W BennettWelch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA.

Funding

Research BaseP30DK072488 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI MITCHELL, BRAXTON D · 2005 to 2019
$17.3M
Healthy for Two/Healthy for You: Pilot testing a remotely-delivered health coaching intervention in women at risk for hypertension or diabetes in pregnancyR03HL136793 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BENNETT, WENDY LYNET · 2017 to 2018
$164k
NHLBI NIH HHS R03 HL136793NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGestational weight gain (GWG) and postpartum weight retention (PPWR) are significant, potentially modifiable, contributors to women's future weight and health trajectories. There is a need for feasible and patient-centered (i.e., convenient, remotely-delivered, technology-enhanced, and accessible through the prenatal care setting) behavioural interventions that limit GWG and PPWR. This study tests the feasibility and acceptability of a remotely-delivered behavioural health coaching intervention to limit gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention.

methodsPregnant women (11-16 weeks gestation) were recruited from two prenatal clinics and randomized to the active intervention or health education comparison group. Completion of the program was monitored and perceived helpfulness was rated (0-100).

resultsTwenty-six women were randomized (

conclusionsThis study provides evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of a remotely-delivered behavioural weight control intervention in pregnancy and postpartum.

Indexed as

gestational weight gainpostpartum weight losspregnancyremote lifestyle intervention

Identifiers

PMID33082990
PMCPMC7556432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.