ArticleObesity science & practice2020
Associations between effort, importance, and self-monitoring during and after a 12-week behavioural weight management program.
Article in Obesity science & practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mobile Apps for Common Noncommunicable Disease Management: Systematic Search in App Stores and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Pooled it
- Adherence to Behavioral Weight Management: A Scoping Review of Definitions, Measurement, and Components.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026Article
- Associations between effort, importance, and self-monitoring during and after a 12-week behavioural weight management program.Obesity science & practice · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSelf-monitoring of weight and caloric intake has been associated with improved weight loss and weight loss maintenance in behavioural weight loss programs; however, participants' adherence to self-monitoring tends to decrease over time. To identify potential barriers to self-monitoring adherence, the current study examined week-to-week associations between ratings of perceived effort, relative importance of weight loss goals, and adherence to self-monitoring of weight and caloric intake during and after a behavioural weight loss programme.
methodParticipants were 74 adults with overweight and obesity enrolled in a 12-week, Internet-based weight loss programme followed by a 40-week "maintenance" period during which no additional intervention was provided. Participants self-reported adherence to self-monitoring and completed ratings of effort and importance on a study website weekly throughout the study period (1 year).
resultsLongitudinal multilevel models demonstrated that higher ratings of effort were associated with fewer days of self-monitoring of weight,
conclusionsPerceptions of effort and importance are both independently associated with adherence to self-monitoring weight and caloric intake, and this effect appears to be stronger after the end of initial intervention. Future research should investigate whether tailoring intervention content based on these constructs can improve adherence to self-monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.