ArticleF1000Research
The worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days.
Article in F1000Research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of remdesivir in patients hospitalised with COVID-19: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical trials in COVID-19 management & prevention: A meta-epidemiological study examining methodological quality.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2021Pooled it
- Reliability of Trial Information Across Registries for Trials With Multiple Registrations: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2021Pooled it
- Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.Nature communications · 2021Pooled it
- Clinical trials in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a ten-year landscape analysis.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Characteristics of Authorized Clinical Trials in Peru, 2017-2025: A National Registry-Based Study.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Evaluation of consistency in adverse event reporting between trial registry and publications in COVID-19 pharmacological intervention trials.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Promoting Diversity through an Understanding of Barriers and Drivers for Inclusive Clinical Trials.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Informed consent and trial prioritization for clinical studies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Stakeholder experiences and viewpoints.PloS one · 2024Article
- Teaching critical thinking about health information and choices in secondary schools: human-centred design of digital resources.F1000Research · 2023Article
- Characteristics and result reporting of registered COVID-19 clinical trials of Chinese and Indian traditional medicine: A comparative analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Estimating the effect of COVID-19 on trial design characteristics: a registered report.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Randomized trials on non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a scoping review.BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2022Article
- Review
- Clinical trial research agenda on COVID-19 - the first two years in Germany and beyond.Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen · 2022Review
- The failure of drug repurposing for COVID-19 as an effect of excessive hypothesis testing and weak mechanistic evidence.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2022Article
- High-cited favorable studies for COVID-19 treatments ineffective in large trials.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2022Article
- The methodology of a "living" COVID-19 registry development in a clinical context.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Results availability and timeliness of registered COVID-19 clinical trials: interim cross-sectional results from the DIRECCT study.BMJ open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.