Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33082716›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. ICASSP (Conference)2019

Inter- and intra-patient ECG heartbeat classification for arrhythmia detection: A sequence to sequence deep learning approach.

Sajad Mousavi, Fatemeh Afghah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. ICASSP (Conference), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. End-to-End Signal Classification in Signed Cumulative Distribution Transform Space.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence · 2024
    Article
  10. A Review of Recurrent Neural Network-Based Methods in Computational Physiology.IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Heartbeat Classification by Random Forest With a Novel Context Feature: A Segment Label.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2022
    Article
  16. A Reparameterization Multifeature Fusion CNN for Arrhythmia Heartbeats Classification.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. ECG Language processing (ELP): A new technique to analyze ECG signals.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sajad MousaviSchool of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
Fatemeh AfghahSchool of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.

Funding

SSCIMA: Integrating Analysis of Socio-economic Sub-population Dynamics to Improve Spatial Models of Infectious DiseaseU54MD012388 · NIMHD · NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY · PI Julie A. Baldwin · 2017 to 2026
$49.7M
NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD012388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocardiogram (ECG) signal is a common and powerful tool to study heart function and diagnose several abnormal arrhythmias. While there have been remarkable improvements in cardiac arrhythmia classification methods, they still cannot offer acceptable performance in detecting different heart conditions, especially when dealing with imbalanced datasets. In this paper, we propose a solution to address this limitation of current classification approaches by developing an automatic heartbeat classification method using deep convolutional neural networks and sequence to sequence models. We evaluated the proposed method on the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database, considering the intra-patient and inter-patient paradigms, and the AAMI EC57 standard. The evaluation results for both paradigms show that our method achieves the best performance in the literature (a positive predictive value of 96.46% and sensitivity of 100% for the category S, and a positive predictive value of 98.68% and sensitivity of 97.40% for the category F for the intra-patient scheme; a positive predictive value of 92.57% and sensitivity of 88.94% for the category S, and a positive predictive value of 99.50% and sensitivity of 99.94% for the category V for the inter-patient scheme.).

Indexed as

deep learningECG analysisheartbeat classificationRNNssequence to sequence model

Identifiers

PMID33082716
PMCPMC7570975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.