Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33082479›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Alternative feed ingredients in the finisher diets for sustainable broiler production.

Ahmed A El-Deek, Ahmed A A Abdel-Wareth, Mona Osman, Mohammed El-Shafey, Ayman M Khalifah, Alaa E Elkomy, Jayant Lohakare

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahmed A El-DeekPoultry Production Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21545, Egypt.
Ahmed A A Abdel-WarethDepartment of Animal and Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture, South Valley University, Qena, 83523, Egypt. a.wareth@agr.svu.edu.eg.
Mona OsmanPoultry Production Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21545, Egypt.
Mohammed El-ShafeyIsmailia/Misr for Poultry Production, 28, Ismailia, Egypt.
Ayman M KhalifahLivestock Department, Arid Land Cultivating Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technology Applications (SRTA City), 21934, New Borg El Arab, Egypt.
Alaa E ElkomyLivestock Department, Arid Land Cultivating Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technology Applications (SRTA City), 21934, New Borg El Arab, Egypt.
Jayant LohakareDepartment of Agriculture-Animal Science Option, University of Arkansas At Pine Bluff, Pine Bluff, AR, 71601, USA. lohakarej@uapb.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the utilization of alternative protein feed ingredients including sunflower meal (SFM), corn gluten meal (CGM), and dried distillers' grains with solubles (DDGS) as a mixture in a partial replacement of soybean meal (SBM) in broiler finisher diets with different protein levels and also to evaluate their effect on birds' performance, environmental aspects of litter, cecal microbes, and economic prospects. A total of 576 (19 days old) Cobb 500 broiler chicks were fed eight finisher diets consisting of 4 control (CTL) diets based on SBM with different crude protein (CP) levels (CTL21, CTL20, CTL19, and CTL18, containing 21%, 20%, 19%, and 18% CP, respectively) and 4 test diets with alternative protein sources (APS21, APS20, APS19, and APS18, containing 21%, 20%, 19%, and 18% CP, respectively) using a 15% combination of alternative protein sources (2.5% CGM, 5% SFM, and 7.5% DDGS) until 35 days of age. The results indicated that birds fed test diets APS21 and APS20 recorded the highest (P < 0.05) body weight compared to other treatments, but it was not different than the CTL diets fed at these CP levels. The birds fed CTL18 or APS18 recorded the worst feed conversion ratio (FCR) compared to other treatments. Moreover, birds fed test diet containing APS21 recorded better (P < 0.05) European performance efficiency factor and better economic efficiency when compared to other treatments, but it was not different than CTL21. In addition, birds fed diets APS21 and CTL19 showed significantly increased litter Lactobacillus spp. (P < 0.05) compared to other treatments. Cecal Lactobacillus spp. and Escherichia coli (E. coli) were not affected by CTL or APS diets. The counts of cecal Salmonella spp. increased in the CTL21 group compared to other groups. In conclusion, alternative feed ingredients (protein sources) in broiler finisher diets have positive effects in a sustainable way on the productive performance, litter and cecal microbial counts, and improved economic efficiency when compared to CTL diets.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaChickensAnimalsBody WeightDietEdible GrainGlutensGlycine maxHelianthusGlutens

Identifiers

PMID33082479
PMCPMC7576801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.