Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33082477›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Short foveo-disc distance in situs inversus of optic disc.

Young In Shin, Kyoung Min Lee, Martha Kim, Sohee Oh, Seok Hwan Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Young In ShinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyoung Min LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Martha KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Sohee OhDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Seok Hwan KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. xcski@hanmail.net.
Seoul National University · KRDongguk University Ilsan Hospital · KRSNUH SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Situs inversus of optic disc (SIOD) is thought to be a congenital optic disc abnormality that is caused by dysversion of optic nerve insertion. SIOD, however, has many additional features that cannot be explained by abnormal optic-nerve-insertion directionality. In this study, we measured the distance between the fovea and disc in 22 eyes of 15 SIOD patients. For comparison, two control eyes were matched with each SIOD eye by age and axial length. The vertical distance between the temporal vascular arcades also was measured. The foveo-disc distance was shorter in the SIOD eyes than in the control eyes, while the inter-arcade distance did not differ. Further, we measured the circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, which showed nasal crowding of two humps in the SIOD eyes. This nasal crowding disappeared when we shifted the circle scan by the mean difference (465 μm) of the foveal-disc distance between the two groups. Our findings suggest that the optic disc was located closer to the fovea than it would have been normally. Thus, SIOD might reflect incomplete expansion of the posterior pole in the direction of the fovea-disc axis.

Indexed as

AgedEyeFemaleFovea CentralisHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersOptic DiskRegional Blood FlowRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsSitus Inversus

Identifiers

PMID33082477
PMCPMC7576120
OpenAlexW3094321488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.