Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33082335›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Deep learning-assisted comparative analysis of animal trajectories with DeepHL.

Takuya Maekawa, Kazuya Ohara, Yizhe Zhang, Matasaburo Fukutomi, Sakiko Matsumoto, Kentarou Matsumura, Hisashi Shidara, Shuhei J Yamazaki, Ryusuke Fujisawa, Kaoru Ide and 8 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Takuya MaekawaGraduate School of Information Science and Technology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan. maekawa@ist.osaka-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-7227-580X
Kazuya OharaGraduate School of Information Science and Technology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Yizhe ZhangGraduate School of Information Science and Technology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Matasaburo FukutomiGraduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan.
Sakiko MatsumotoGraduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Kentarou MatsumuraGraduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Hisashi ShidaraDepartment of Biological Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3992-9226
Shuhei J YamazakiGraduate School of Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Ryusuke FujisawaGraduate School of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Iizuka, Japan.
Kaoru IdeGraduate School of Brain Science, Doshisha University, Kyotanabe, Japan.
Naohisa NagayaDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan.
Koji YamazakiDepartment of Forest Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinsuke KoikeGraduate School of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2926-8196
Takahisa MiyatakeGraduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5476-0676
Koutarou D KimuraGraduate School of Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3359-1578
Hiroto OgawaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4927-9714
Susumu TakahashiGraduate School of Brain Science, Doshisha University, Kyotanabe, Japan.
Ken YodaGraduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comparative analysis of animal behavior (e.g., male vs. female groups) has been widely used to elucidate behavior specific to one group since pre-Darwinian times. However, big data generated by new sensing technologies, e.g., GPS, makes it difficult for them to contrast group differences manually. This study introduces DeepHL, a deep learning-assisted platform for the comparative analysis of animal movement data, i.e., trajectories. This software uses a deep neural network based on an attention mechanism to automatically detect segments in trajectories that are characteristic of one group. It then highlights these segments in visualized trajectories, enabling biologists to focus on these segments, and helps them reveal the underlying meaning of the highlighted segments to facilitate formulating new hypotheses. We tested the platform on a variety of trajectories of worms, insects, mice, bears, and seabirds across a scale from millimeters to hundreds of kilometers, revealing new movement features of these animals.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBirdsFemaleInsectaMiceMovementNeural Networks, ComputerSoftwareUrsidae

Identifiers

PMID33082335
PMCPMC7576204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.