Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33082307›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2020

EVI1 phosphorylation at S436 regulates interactions with CtBP1 and DNMT3A and promotes self-renewal.

Roberto Paredes, James R Kelly, Bethany Geary, Batool Almarzouq, Marion Schneider, Stella Pearson, Prakrithi Narayanan, Andrew Williamson, Simon C Lovell, Daniel H Wiseman and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Roberto ParedesStem Cell and Leukaemia Proteomics Laboratory, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
James R KellyStem Cell and Leukaemia Proteomics Laboratory, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Bethany GearyStem Cell and Leukaemia Proteomics Laboratory, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Batool AlmarzouqDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Integrative Biology/School of Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Marion SchneiderStem Cell and Leukaemia Proteomics Laboratory, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Stella PearsonStem Cell and Leukaemia Proteomics Laboratory, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Prakrithi NarayananStem Cell and Leukaemia Proteomics Laboratory, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2596-2738
Andrew WilliamsonStem Cell and Leukaemia Proteomics Laboratory, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Simon C LovellManchester Academic Health Science Centre, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK.
Daniel H WisemanManchester Academic Health Science Centre, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK.
John A ChadwickManchester Academic Health Science Centre, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK.
Nigel J JonesDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Integrative Biology/School of Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Olga KustikovaInstitute of Experimental Hematology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Axel SchambachInstitute of Experimental Hematology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Terence GarnerManchester Academic Health Science Centre, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK.
Fabio M R AmaralManchester Academic Health Science Centre, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK.
Andrew PierceStem Cell and Leukaemia Proteomics Laboratory, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Adam StevensManchester Academic Health Science Centre, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1950-7325
Tim C P SomervailleManchester Academic Health Science Centre, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK.
Anthony D WhettonStem Cell and Leukaemia Proteomics Laboratory, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Stefan MeyerStem Cell and Leukaemia Proteomics Laboratory, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. stefan.meyer@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2283-3690
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 29389Cancer Research UK C18601/A5901Cancer Research UK C5759/A20971Medical Research Council MR/M008959/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transcriptional regulator EVI1 has an essential role in early development and haematopoiesis. However, acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) driven by aberrantly high EVI1 expression has very poor prognosis. To investigate the effects of post-translational modifications on EVI1 function, we carried out a mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of EVI1 in AML and detected dynamic phosphorylation at serine 436 (S436). Wild-type EVI1 (EVI1-WT) with S436 available for phosphorylation, but not non-phosphorylatable EVI1-S436A, conferred haematopoietic progenitor cell self-renewal and was associated with significantly higher organised transcriptional patterns. In silico modelling of EVI1-S436 phosphorylation showed reduced affinity to CtBP1, and CtBP1 showed reduced interaction with EVI1-WT compared with EVI1-S436A. The motif harbouring S436 is a target of CDK2 and CDK3 kinases, which interacted with EVI1-WT. The methyltransferase DNMT3A bound preferentially to EVI1-WT compared with EVI1-S436A, and a hypomethylated cell population associated by EVI1-WT expression in murine haematopoietic progenitors is not maintained with EVI1-S436A. These data point to EVI1-S436 phosphorylation directing functional protein interactions for haematopoietic self-renewal. Targeting EVI1-S436 phosphorylation may be of therapeutic benefit when treating EVI1-driven leukaemia.

Indexed as

Alcohol OxidoreductasesCell Self RenewalDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA MethylationDNA Methyltransferase 3ADNA Modification MethylasesHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMDS1 and EVI1 Complex Locus ProteinPhosphorylationPrognosisSerineTranscription FactorsAlcohol OxidoreductasesC-terminal binding proteinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA Methyltransferase 3ADNA Modification MethylasesDNMT3A protein, humanMDS1 and EVI1 Complex Locus ProteinMECOM protein, humanSerineTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID33082307
PMCPMC7576810
OpenAlexW3093789108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.