ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020
Clinical Utility of 3-Dimensional Reconstruction Images to Predict Conservative Treatment Outcomes of Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fractures.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corrective osteotomy for distal radius malunion using 3D-printed patient-specific guides and spacers: a retrospective comparative study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- A Novel Method to Represent the Three-Dimensional Inclination of the Distal Radius Joint Surface.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical Application of 3D-Assisted Surgery Techniques in Treatment of Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review in 718 Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Surgical treatment of distal radius fractures: impact on forearm rotation in non-elderly patients.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Three-dimensional (3D) images can provide additional information on bone fractures, especially in patients with intra-articular distal radius fractures (DRFs). We aimed to identify possible risk factors for adverse outcomes using a 3D reconstruction technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who underwent plaster immobilization with or without closed reduction for DRFs in our hospital between February 2016 and May 2019. The 3D reconstruction image of DRFs was viewed from multiple angles to determine the existence of gaps or steps. Then, a semiquantitative standard was used to assess the severity of fracture. The patients' basic data and radiographic data were collected, and multiple linear regression analyses were used to identify possible risk factors associated with adverse outcomes. RESULTS A total of 89 cases were analyzed in our study. There were 28, 39, and 22 patients with level 1, 2, or 3 fractures, respectively, based on the semiquantitative standard. In a multiple linear regression, preoperative severity degree (ß, 0.393; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.260-0.526) and postoperative rehabilitation exercise (ß, 0.352; 95% CI, 0.023-0.681) were associated with the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Our study presents a new method based on 3D reconstruction images to assess the severity of intra-articular DRFs. Patients who were identified as having severe fractures based on this method were found to have worse functional outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.