Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33082192›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Osseointegrated reconstruction and rehabilitation of transtibial amputees: the Osseointegration Group of Australia surgical technique and protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Russel Haque, Shakib Al-Jawazneh, Jason Hoellwarth, Muhammad Adeel Akhtar, Karan Doshi, Yao Chang Tan, William Yenn-Ru Lu, Claudia Roberts, Munjed Al Muderis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transcutaneous osseointegration for amputees.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Russel HaqueDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, North Ryde BC, New South Wales, Australia.
Shakib Al-JawaznehDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, North Ryde BC, New South Wales, Australia.
Jason HoellwarthDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, North Ryde BC, New South Wales, Australia.
Muhammad Adeel AkhtarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, NHS Fife, Kirkcaldy, UK.
Karan DoshiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, North Ryde BC, New South Wales, Australia.
Yao Chang TanDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
William Yenn-Ru LuDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia research@osseointegrationaustralia.com.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6919-8367
Claudia RobertsThe Limb Reconstruction Discipline, Macquarie University Hospital, North Ryde BC, New South Wales, Australia.
Munjed Al MuderisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, North Ryde BC, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLower extremity amputation uniformly impairs a person's vocational, social and recreational capacity. Rehabilitation in traditional socket prostheses (TSP) is associated with a spectrum of complications involving the socket-residuum interface which lead to reduced prosthetic use and quality of life. Osseointegration has recently emerged as a novel concept to overcome these complications by eliminating this interface and anchoring the prosthesis directly to bone. Though the complications of TSPs affect both transfemoral and transtibial amputees, Osseointegration has been predominantly performed in transfemoral ones assuming a greater benefit/risk ratio. However, as the safety of the procedure has been established, we intend to extend the concept to transtibial amputees and document the outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is protocol for a prospective cohort study, with patient enrolment started in 2014 and expected to be completed by 2022. The inclusion criteria are age over 18 years, unilateral, bilateral and mixed transtibial amputation and experiencing socket-related problems. All patients receive osseointegrated implants, the type of which depend on the length of the residuum and quality of bone, which are press-fitted into the residual bone. Objective functional outcomes comprising 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed Up-and-Go test and K-level, subjective patient-reported-quality-of-life outcomes (Short Form Health Survey 36, daily prosthetic wear hours, prosthetic wear satisfaction) and adverse events are recorded preoperatively and at postoperative follow-up intervals of 3, 6, 12 months and yearly, and compared with the preoperative values using appropriate statistical tests. Multivariable multilevel logistic regression will be performed with a focus to identify factors associated with outcomes and adverse events, specifically infection, periprosthetic fracture, implant fracture and aseptic loosening. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Ethics approval for the study has been received from the University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia (014153S). The outcomes of this study will be disseminated by publications in peer-reviewed academic journals and scientific presentations at relevant orthopaedic conferences.

Indexed as

AmputeesAdolescentAustraliaHumansOsseointegrationProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignQuality of LifeTreatment Outcomelimb reconstructionorthopaedic & trauma surgeryplastic & reconstructive surgeryrehabilitation medicine

Identifiers

PMID33082192
PMCPMC7577069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.