Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33082054›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2021

Femoral Cartilage Ultrasound Echo Intensity Associates with Arthroscopic Cartilage Damage.

Matthew S Harkey, Erin Little, Mikaela Thompson, Ming Zhang, Jeffrey B Driban, Matthew J Salzler

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Walking recovers cartilage compressive strain in vivo.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Femoral cartilage ultrasound echo-intensity is a valid measure of cartilage composition.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew S HarkeyDepartment of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA; Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, & Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: harkeym1@msu.edu.
Erin LittleDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, & Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mikaela ThompsonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ming ZhangDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, & Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Computer Science & Networking, Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jeffrey B DribanDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, & Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Matthew J SalzlerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceTL1TR001454 · NCATS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LEWIS, BRIAN C · 2015 to 2024
$3.6M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared quantitative cartilage ultrasound metrics between people with (n = 12) and without (n = 12) arthroscopic cartilage damage after anterior cruciate ligament injury (age, 24.9 ± 3.7 y; sex, 33% female, 67% male; days since injury = 50 ± 52). A transverse suprapatellar ultrasound assessment imaged the femoral cartilage in participants' injured knees before a clinical arthroscopy. A custom program automatically separated a manual cartilage segmentation into standardized medial and lateral femoral regions and calculated mean thickness (i.e., cross-sectional area/length of cartilage-bone interface), mean echo intensity and echo-intensity heterogeneity. An orthopedic surgeon assessed arthroscopic cartilage damage in the medial and lateral femoral condyles using the Outerbridge grading system (cartilage damage = Outerbridge ≥ 1). Separate logistic regressions for medial and lateral femoral cartilage were used to determine the association between each ultrasound metric and arthroscopic cartilage damage. In medial femoral cartilage, for every 1 standard deviation decrease in echo-intensity mean and heterogeneity, there is, respectively, a 91% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.69) and 97% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.50) increase in the odds of having arthroscopic cartilage damage. Lateral cartilage ultrasound metrics are not associated with lateral arthroscopic cartilage damage. This study provides preliminary evidence that femoral cartilage ultrasound echo intensity is a non-invasive measure associated with medial femoral cartilage health after anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyAdultAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesCartilage, ArticularFemaleHumansMaleUltrasonographyYoung AdultArthroscopyCartilage thicknessKneeOuterbridgeUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID33082054
PMCPMC7568485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.