Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33082053›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2021

Portable Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Scanner for the Evaluation of Lung Involvement in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients.

David Bennett, Elda De Vita, Fabrizio Mezzasalma, Nicola Lanzarone, Paolo Cameli, Francesco Bianchi, Felice Perillo, Elena Bargagli, Maria Antonietta Mazzei, Luca Volterrani and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Use of a handheld ultrasound device for detecting orbital inflammation.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Hand-Held Ultrasound of the Lung: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David BennettRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy. Electronic address: David.btt@gmail.com.
Elda De VitaRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy.
Fabrizio MezzasalmaDiagnostic and Interventional Bronchoscopy Unit, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy.
Nicola LanzaroneRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy.
Paolo CameliRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy.
Francesco BianchiRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy.
Felice PerilloRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy.
Elena BargagliRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy; Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, Italy.
Maria Antonietta MazzeiDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, Italy; Diagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy.
Luca VolterraniDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, Italy; Diagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy.
Sabino ScollettaDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, Italy; DEA and Transplant Anesthesia and Resuscitation Unit, Department of Emergency-Urgency and Transplantation, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy.
Serafina ValenteClinical-Surgical Cardiology Unit, Radiological Sciences Department, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy.
Federico FranchiDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, Italy; DEA and Transplant Anesthesia and Resuscitation Unit, Department of Emergency-Urgency and Transplantation, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy.
Bruno FredianiDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, Italy; Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy.
Piersante SestiniRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy; Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese · ITUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging of the lung (LUS) and associated tissues has demonstrated clinical utility in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possibilities of a portable pocket-sized ultrasound scanner in the evaluation of lung involvement in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. We conducted 437 paired readings in 34 LUS evaluations of hospitalized individuals with COVID-19. The LUS scans were performed on the same day with a standard high-end ultrasound scanner (Venue GO, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) and a pocket-sized ultrasound scanner (Butterfly iQ, Butterfly Network Inc., Guilford, CT, USA). Fourteen scans were performed on individuals with severe cases, 11 on individuals with moderate cases and nine on individuals with mild cases. No difference was observed between groups in days since onset of symptoms (23.29 ± 10.07, 22.91 ± 8.91 and 28.56 ± 11.13 d, respectively; p = 0.38). No significant differences were found between LUS scores obtained with the high-end and the portable pocket-sized ultrasound scanner. LUS scores in individuals with mild respiratory impairment were significantly lower than in those with moderate and severe cases. Our study confirms the possibilities of portable pocket-sized ultrasound imaging of the lung in COVID-19 patients. Portable pocket-sized ultrasound scanners are cheap, easy to handle and equivalent to standard scanners for non-invasive assessment of severity and dynamic observation of lung lesions in COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19Equipment DesignHumansLungReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexUltrasonographyAcute respiratory failureCOVID-19HandheldImagingLung ultrasoundPneumoniaSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33082053
PMCPMC7505580
OpenAlexW3087700450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.