Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33081832›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2020

Leveraging locus-specific epigenetic heterogeneity to improve the performance of blood-based DNA methylation biomarkers.

Brendan F Miller, Thomas R Pisanic Ii, Gennady Margolin, Hanna M Petrykowska, Pornpat Athamanolap, Alexander Goncearenco, Akosua Osei-Tutu, Christina M Annunziata, Tza-Huei Wang, Laura Elnitski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis Based on Cell-Free DNA Methylation.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Brendan F MillerTranslational Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Thomas R Pisanic IiInstitute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA. tpisanic@jhu.edu.
Gennady MargolinTranslational Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Hanna M PetrykowskaTranslational Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Pornpat AthamanolapDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Alexander GoncearencoTranslational Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Akosua Osei-TutuWomen's Malignancy Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Christina M AnnunziataWomen's Malignancy Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Tza-Huei WangInstitute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Laura ElnitskiTranslational Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. elnitski@mail.nih.gov.
Johns Hopkins University · USNational Institutes of Health · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Human Genome Research Institute · US

Funding

ValidationU54CA151838 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI POMPER, MARTIN G · 2010 to 2014
$11.9M
Ultrasensitive Detection of Tumor Specific DNA Methylation Changes for the Early Detection of Lung Cancer U01CA214165 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HERMAN, JAMES G., WANG, TZA-HUEI JEFF · 2016 to 2021
$3.1M
Multiplexed Detection of Cell Free DNA Biomarkers for CancerR01CA155305 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TZA-HUEI JEFF · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Digital Detection of Tumor-Derived Circulating Methylated DNAR21CA186809 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TZA-HUEI JEFF · 2014 to 2016
$698k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155305NCI NIH HHS R21 CA186809NCI NIH HHS U01 CA214165NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVariation in intercellular methylation patterns can complicate the use of methylation biomarkers for clinical diagnostic applications such as blood-based cancer testing. Here, we describe development and validation of a methylation density binary classification method called EpiClass (available for download at https://github.com/Elnitskilab/EpiClass ) that can be used to predict and optimize the performance of methylation biomarkers, particularly in challenging, heterogeneous samples such as liquid biopsies. This approach is based upon leveraging statistical differences in single-molecule sample methylation density distributions to identify ideal thresholds for sample classification.

resultsWe developed and tested the classifier using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) data derived from ovarian carcinoma tissue DNA and controls. We used these data to perform in silico simulations using methylation density profiles from individual epiallelic copies of ZNF154, a genomic locus known to be recurrently methylated in numerous cancer types. From these profiles, we predicted the performance of the classifier in liquid biopsies for the detection of epithelial ovarian carcinomas (EOC). In silico analysis indicated that EpiClass could be leveraged to better identify cancer-positive liquid biopsy samples by implementing precise thresholds with respect to methylation density profiles derived from circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis. These predictions were confirmed experimentally using DREAMing to perform digital methylation density analysis on a cohort of low volume (1-ml) plasma samples obtained from 26 EOC-positive and 41 cancer-free women. EpiClass performance was then validated in an independent cohort of 24 plasma specimens, derived from a longitudinal study of 8 EOC-positive women, and 12 plasma specimens derived from 12 healthy women, respectively, attaining a sensitivity/specificity of 91.7%/100.0%. Direct comparison of CA-125 measurements with EpiClass demonstrated that EpiClass was able to better identify EOC-positive women than standard CA-125 assessment. Finally, we used independent whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) datasets to demonstrate that EpiClass can also identify other cancer types as well or better than alternative methylation-based classifiers.

conclusionsOur results indicate that assessment of intramolecular methylation density distributions calculated from cfDNA facilitates the use of methylation biomarkers for diagnostic applications. Furthermore, we demonstrated that EpiClass analysis of ZNF154 methylation was able to outperform CA-125 in the detection of etiologically diverse ovarian carcinomas, indicating broad utility of ZNF154 for use as a biomarker of ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCase-Control StudiesCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCohort StudiesCpG IslandsDNA MethylationEpigenomicsFemaleGenomicsHumansKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsLiquid BiopsyLongitudinal StudiesOvarian NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCell-Free Nucleic AcidsKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsZNF154 protein, humanCancer diagnosticsCell-free DNADNA methylationIntermolecular variationOvarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID33081832
PMCPMC7574234
OpenAlexW3094390725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.