ArticleClinical epigenetics2020
Leveraging locus-specific epigenetic heterogeneity to improve the performance of blood-based DNA methylation biomarkers.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early diagnosis of ovarian cancer based on methylation profiles in peripheral blood cell-free DNA: a systematic review.Clinical epigenetics · 2023Pooled it
- Epigenetic mechanisms and clinical translation in ovarian cancer: from molecular pathways to precision therapy.Bioscience reports · 2026Review
- From Spatial Epigenomes to Clinical Diagnostics: Integrative Methylomics Across Scales and Modalities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Hypermethylation of ZNF154 promotes malignant potential of ovarian cancer cells by diminishing ZNF154/KAP1-mediated ROMO1 repression.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Discovery and performance of DNA methylation panels for cancer detection and classification in blood.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Monitoring breast cancer progression through circulating methylated GCM2 and TMEM240 detection.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- Clinical utility of various liquid biopsy samples for the early detection of ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Multiplex digital profiling of DNA methylation heterogeneity for sensitive and cost-effective cancer detection in low-volume liquid biopsies.Science advances · 2024Article
- Single-molecule epiallelic profiling of DNA derived from routinely collected Pap specimens for noninvasive detection of ovarian cancer.Clinical and translational medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Cell type deconvolution of methylated cell-free DNA at the resolution of individual reads.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis Based on Cell-Free DNA Methylation.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVariation in intercellular methylation patterns can complicate the use of methylation biomarkers for clinical diagnostic applications such as blood-based cancer testing. Here, we describe development and validation of a methylation density binary classification method called EpiClass (available for download at https://github.com/Elnitskilab/EpiClass ) that can be used to predict and optimize the performance of methylation biomarkers, particularly in challenging, heterogeneous samples such as liquid biopsies. This approach is based upon leveraging statistical differences in single-molecule sample methylation density distributions to identify ideal thresholds for sample classification.
resultsWe developed and tested the classifier using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) data derived from ovarian carcinoma tissue DNA and controls. We used these data to perform in silico simulations using methylation density profiles from individual epiallelic copies of ZNF154, a genomic locus known to be recurrently methylated in numerous cancer types. From these profiles, we predicted the performance of the classifier in liquid biopsies for the detection of epithelial ovarian carcinomas (EOC). In silico analysis indicated that EpiClass could be leveraged to better identify cancer-positive liquid biopsy samples by implementing precise thresholds with respect to methylation density profiles derived from circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis. These predictions were confirmed experimentally using DREAMing to perform digital methylation density analysis on a cohort of low volume (1-ml) plasma samples obtained from 26 EOC-positive and 41 cancer-free women. EpiClass performance was then validated in an independent cohort of 24 plasma specimens, derived from a longitudinal study of 8 EOC-positive women, and 12 plasma specimens derived from 12 healthy women, respectively, attaining a sensitivity/specificity of 91.7%/100.0%. Direct comparison of CA-125 measurements with EpiClass demonstrated that EpiClass was able to better identify EOC-positive women than standard CA-125 assessment. Finally, we used independent whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) datasets to demonstrate that EpiClass can also identify other cancer types as well or better than alternative methylation-based classifiers.
conclusionsOur results indicate that assessment of intramolecular methylation density distributions calculated from cfDNA facilitates the use of methylation biomarkers for diagnostic applications. Furthermore, we demonstrated that EpiClass analysis of ZNF154 methylation was able to outperform CA-125 in the detection of etiologically diverse ovarian carcinomas, indicating broad utility of ZNF154 for use as a biomarker of ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.