Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33081771›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2020

Bioengineered human skeletal muscle capable of functional regeneration.

J W Fleming, A J Capel, R P Rimington, P Wheeler, A N Leonard, N C Bishop, O G Davies, M P Lewis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Chestnut (Nutrients · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Arsenic disrupts extracellular vesicle-mediated signaling in regenerating myofibers.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Modelling Skeletal Muscle Ageing and RepairJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2023
    Article
  15. A conciseFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J W FlemingSchool of Sports, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1856-5176
A J CapelSchool of Sports, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.
R P RimingtonSchool of Sports, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.
P WheelerSchool of Sports, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.
A N LeonardSchool of Sports, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.
N C BishopSchool of Sports, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.
O G DaviesSchool of Sports, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.
M P LewisSchool of Sports, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK. m.p.lewis@lboro.ac.uk.
Loughborough University · GB

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/N509516/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research G0900762/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkeletal muscle (SkM) regenerates following injury, replacing damaged tissue with high fidelity. However, in serious injuries, non-regenerative defects leave patients with loss of function, increased re-injury risk and often chronic pain. Progress in treating these non-regenerative defects has been slow, with advances only occurring where a comprehensive understanding of regeneration has been gained. Tissue engineering has allowed the development of bioengineered models of SkM which regenerate following injury to support research in regenerative physiology. To date, however, no studies have utilised human myogenic precursor cells (hMPCs) to closely mimic functional human regenerative physiology.

resultsHere we address some of the difficulties associated with cell number and hMPC mitogenicity using magnetic association cell sorting (MACS), for the marker CD56, and media supplementation with fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2) and B-27 supplement. Cell sorting allowed extended expansion of myogenic cells and supplementation was shown to improve myogenesis within engineered tissues and force generation at maturity. In addition, these engineered human SkM regenerated following barium chloride (BaCl

conclusionsThis work outlines an engineered human SkM capable of functional regeneration following injury, built upon an open source system adding to the pre-clinical testing toolbox to improve the understanding of basic regenerative physiology.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell ProliferationMuscle DevelopmentRegenerationBarium CompoundsBioengineeringChloridesHumansMuscle, Skeletalbarium chlorideBarium CompoundsChloridesRegenerationSatellite cellSkeletal muscleTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID33081771
PMCPMC7576716
OpenAlexW3094115083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.