ArticleBMC health services research2020
Development and evaluation of the measurement properties of a generic questionnaire measuring patient perceptions of person-centred care.
Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Delivery of Person-Centered Care for People Living With Dementia in Residential Aged Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Gerontologist · 2024Pooled it
- Spanish Translation, Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Person-Centred Practice Inventory-Care (PCPI-C): Enhancing Collaborative Care and Patient Involvement.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- A non-randomised controlled study of the missing link person-centred care transition support intervention after stroke or TIA.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Ambivalence in decision making for outdoor mobility among adult child carers of people with dementia: a study protocol for a randomized vignette study with message framing and eye-tracking.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Lessons learned from the frontline implementing person-centered practice: a practical pathway that addresses known challenges.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an enhanced PERCCI-S (PERCCI-S-Rev) for measuring person-centred home-based primary care.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Article
- Iranian university students' alcohol-related knowledge, attitude, and practice questionnaire (ISKAP alcohol Q): development and psychometric properties.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Getting Inside Closed-Loop Referrals: Exploring the Patient Experience of Finding and Connecting to Social Care With a Community Resource Referral System Using a Community-Based Participatory Approach.Health services research · 2025Article
- Article
- The Boost Team: transforming outreach for female veterans in rural communities.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- [Translation and transcultural adaptation of the Person-Centered Practice Inventory-Care for Spanish patients].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2024Article
- Evaluating person-centered care in neurological outpatient care: a mixed-methods content validity study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- The development and structural validity testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory-Care (PCPI-C).PloS one · 2024Article
- Pain, comorbidities, and clinical decision-making: conceptualization, development, and pilot testing of the Pain in Aging, Educational Assessment of Need instrument.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Perception of feeling safe perioperatively: a concept analysis.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023Review
- Article
- Further development and evaluation of a questionnaire targeting person-centred outpatient care for persons with long-term conditions.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2023Article
- Tracking, naming, specifying, and comparing implementation strategies for person-centred care in a real-world setting: a case study with seven embedded units.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Operationalisation of person-centred care in a real-world setting: a case study with six embedded units.BMC health services research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImplementation of person-centred care (PCC) is a challenging undertaking. Thus, a call has been issued for a robust and generic instrument to measure and enable evaluation of PCC across settings and patient groups. This study aimed to develop a generic questionnaire measuring patients' perceptions of PCC. Further aims were to evaluate its content and measurement properties using a mixed-methods approach entailing Rasch and qualitative content analyses.
methodsThe study was conducted in three iterative phases. Phase one included six key informants to gain a broad view of the concept. Phase two entailed a Delphi study involving two rounds with eight experts who generated ratings on relevance, readability, comprehensiveness and suggestions for revision. Data were analysed using the Item Content Validity Index in conjunction with qualitative comments to improve the questionnaire. Phase three was performed using a mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were collected from patients (n = 553) responding to the questionnaire who were recruited from six in- and outpatient care units in a health care region in Sweden. Data was analysed using the Rasch measurement model. Qualitative data were based on the respondents' free-text comments, cognitive interviews (n = 10) and field notes, and then analysed with deductive content analysis.
resultsA questionnaire was developed and operationalised based on the information given by key informants in phase one and then validated for its content by experts in phase two. In phase three Rasch analyses revealed problems with targeting, thresholds and two misfitting items. These problems were corroborated by data from the qualitative analyses, which also revealed some issues of wording and interpretation of items. When thresholds were resolved and two items removed, the questionnaire met the assumptions of the Rasch model.
conclusionsExperts gave the questionnaire content high ratings and it met measurement requirements assumed by the Rasch model after revisions. Those problems on targeting that remain need to be addressed in future studies. Meanwhile, we regard the questionnaire as of sufficient quality to be useful in benchmarking PCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.