Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33081712›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020

Towards the elimination of dog-mediated rabies: development and application of an evidence-based management tool.

Kristyna Rysava, Tamara Mancero, Eduardo Caldas, Mary Freire de Carvalho, André P B Castro, Veronica Gutiérrez, Daniel T Haydon, Paul C D Johnson, Rebecca Mancy, Lúcia R Montebello and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Human rabies: prospects for elimination.CAB reviews : perspectives in agriculture, veterinary science, nutrition and natural resources · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kristyna RysavaUniversity of Warwick, School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, UK. K.Rysava@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3475-931X
Tamara ManceroPan American Health Organization (PAHO), Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Eduardo CaldasVirology, Central Laboratory, State Center for Health Surveillance, State Department of Health, São Paulo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Mary Freire de CarvalhoPan American Health Organization (PAHO), Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
André P B CastroMinistry of Health, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Veronica GutiérrezMinistry of Health, Mexico, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
Daniel T HaydonUniversity of Glasgow, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Graham Kerr building, MVLS, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Paul C D JohnsonUniversity of Glasgow, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Graham Kerr building, MVLS, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Rebecca MancyUniversity of Glasgow, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Graham Kerr building, MVLS, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Lúcia R MontebelloMinistry of Health, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Silene M RochaMinistry of Health, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Jesús F Gonzalez RoldanMinistry of Health, Mexico, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
Marco Antonio Natal VigilatoPan American Health Organization (PAHO), Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Victor Del Rio VilasPan American Health Organization (PAHO), Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Katie HampsonUniversity of Glasgow, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Graham Kerr building, MVLS, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/GCRF-IAA/08Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M01116X/1Medical Research Council MR/R025649/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 095787/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust 207569/Z/17/ZWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternational organizations advocate for the elimination of dog-mediated rabies, but there is only limited guidance on interpreting surveillance data for managing elimination programmes. With the regional programme in Latin America approaching elimination of dog-mediated rabies, we aimed to develop a tool to evaluate the programme's performance and generate locally-tailored rabies control programme management guidance to overcome remaining obstacles.

methodsWe developed and validated a robust algorithm to classify progress towards rabies elimination within sub-national administrative units, which we applied to surveillance data from Brazil and Mexico. The method combines criteria that are easy to understand, including logistic regression analysis of case detection time series, assessment of rabies virus variants, and of incursion risk. Subjecting the algorithm to robustness testing, we further employed simulated data sub-sampled at differing levels of case detection to assess the algorithm's performance and sensitivity to surveillance quality.

resultsOur tool demonstrated clear epidemiological transitions in Mexico and Brazil: most states progressed rapidly towards elimination, but a few regressed due to incursions and control lapses. In 2015, dog-mediated rabies continued to circulate in the poorest states, with foci remaining in only 1 of 32 states in Mexico, and 2 of 27 in Brazil, posing incursion risks to the wider region. The classification tool was robust in determining epidemiological status irrespective of most levels of surveillance quality. In endemic settings, surveillance would need to detect less than 2.5% of all circulating cases to result in misclassification, whereas in settings where incursions become the main source of cases the threshold detection level for correct classification should not be less than 5%.

conclusionOur tool provides guidance on how to progress effectively towards elimination targets and tailor strategies to local epidemiological situations, while revealing insights into rabies dynamics. Post-campaign assessments of dog vaccination coverage in endemic states, and enhanced surveillance to verify and maintain freedom in states threatened by incursions were identified as priorities to catalyze progress towards elimination. Our finding suggests genomic surveillance should become increasingly valuable during the endgame for discriminating circulating variants and pinpointing sources of incursions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBrazilDisease EradicationDog DiseasesDogsGenomicsHumansInfection ControlLatin AmericaMass VaccinationMexicoRabiesRabies virusRetrospective StudiesVaccination CoverageCanine rabiesDecision support toolFreedom from diseaseInterruption of transmissionManagement recommendationsMass dog vaccinationScientific guidanceSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID33081712
PMCPMC7574347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.