ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020
Sex differences in moral judgements across 67 countries.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Moral judgment and hormones: A systematic literature review.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Acute lorazepam administration does not significantly affect moral attitudes or judgments.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- A Dual Route to Distrust of Atheists: Perceiving Atheists to Lack Individualizing Moral Foundations and an External Moralizing Agent Heightens Christians' Distrust.Group processes & intergroup relations : GPIR · 2026Article
- Gender equality predicts female overrepresentation only in competitive domains where they have a relative advantage over males.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Investigators are human too: outcome bias and perceptions of individual culpability in patient safety incident investigations.BMJ quality & safety · 2026Article
- Faith in the future of sport: value differences among young athletes in Finland, Italy, Poland, and Sweden.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Age, gender, and score distributions of moral foundations.PloS one · 2026Article
- Impact of Universal Test and Treat (UTT) on anticipated stigma among patients newly diagnosed with HIV in Johannesburg, South Africa: A cross-sectional study.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Sexual health is a priority for African family medicine and primary care research.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025Article
- Do Social Relationships Influence Moral Judgment? A Cross-Cultural Examination.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Ethics trumps resources in women's and men's evaluations of potential mates and competitors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The German translation of the Oxford utilitarianism scale: Validation and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the observations.PloS one · 2025Article
- Higher education students' perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Different judgment frameworks for moral compliance and moral violation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The paucity of morality in everyday talk.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- An analytical framework for studying attitude towards emotional AI: The three-pronged approach.MethodsX · 2023Review
- Moral Foundations Questionnaire and Moral Foundations Sacredness Scale: Assessing the Factorial Structure of the Dutch Translations.Psychologica Belgica · 2023Article
- Interpretations and revenge goals in response to peer provocations: Comparing adolescents in the United States and Pakistan.International journal of behavioral development · 2022Article
- Men are less religious in more gender-equal countries.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most of the empirical research on sex differences and cultural variations in morality has relied on within-culture analyses or small-scale cross-cultural data. To further broaden the scientific understanding of sex differences in morality, the current research relies on two international samples to provide the first large-scale examination of sex differences in moral judgements nested within cultures. Using a sample from 67 countries (Study 1;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.