Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33081611›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020

Extreme developmental instability associated with wing plasticity in pea aphids.

Rachel E Hammelman, Carrie L Heusinkveld, Emily T Hung, Alydia Meineke, Benjamin J Parker, Jennifer A Brisson

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel E HammelmanDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Carrie L HeusinkveldDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Emily T HungDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Alydia MeinekeDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Benjamin J ParkerDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Jennifer A BrissonDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
University of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key focus of evolutionary developmental biology is on how phenotypic diversity is generated. In particular, both plasticity and developmental instability contribute to phenotypic variation among genetically identical individuals, but the interactions between the two phenomena and their general fitness impacts are unclear. We discovered a striking example of asymmetry in pea aphids: the presence of wings on one side and the complete or partial absence of wings on the opposite side. We used this asymmetric phenotype to study the connection between plasticity, developmental instability and fitness. We found that this asymmetric wing development (i) occurred equally on both sides and thus is a developmental instability; (ii) is present in some genetically unique lines but not others, and thus has a genetic basis; and (iii) has intermediate levels of fecundity, and thus does not necessarily have negative fitness consequences. We conclude that this dramatic asymmetry may arise from incomplete switching between developmental targets, linking plasticity and developmental instability. We suspect that what we have observed may be a more widespread phenomenon, occurring across species that routinely produce distinct, alternative phenotypes.

Indexed as

Wings, AnimalAnimalsAphidsBiological EvolutionPhenotypePisum sativumdevelopmental instabilityfluctuating asymmetrypea aphidpolyphenismwing dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID33081611
PMCPMC7661304
OpenAlexW3094039932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.