Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33081554›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2020

Atypical magnetic resonance imaging features and differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Shuang-Yu Wang, Lei Yin, Chen Wang, Ming-Ping Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuang-Yu WangDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Provincial Clinical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Lei YinDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Provincial Clinical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Chen WangDepartment of Pathology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Provincial Clinical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Ming-Ping MaDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Provincial Clinical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3638-3472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignant tumor of the liver. We aimed to summarize and analyze the atypical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of HCC to improve its diagnostic accuracy.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed MRI data for 66 patients with HCC with atypical MRI features confirmed by operation and pathology.

resultsTwelve patients had high signals and 18 patients had significant decreases in opposed phase signals in T1WI plain scans. Nine patients had high signals and six patients had large cystic lesions in apparent diffusion coefficient images. Dynamic enhancement showed progressive enhancement in 15 patients, ring enhancement in three, irregular patchy enhancement in three, 'nodule-in-nodule' enhancement in six, delayed central patchy enhancement in six, delayed central 'star-like aristate scars' (T2WI revealed high signal intensity) in 21, and poor blood supply in three patients.

conclusionsMRI can make a clear diagnosis of typical HCC, and atypical cases can also be distinguished from other tumors or tumor-like lesions by MRI. The analysis of atypical signs may improve the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for HCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesContrast Mediaatypicaldifferential diagnosisenhancementHepatocellular carcinomamagnetic resonance imagingpathological section

Identifiers

PMID33081554
PMCPMC7588765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.