Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33081335›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Review of Organizational Health Literacy Practice at Health Care Centers: Outcomes, Barriers and Facilitators.

Elham Charoghchian Khorasani, Seyedeh Belin Tavakoly Sany, Hadi Tehrani, Hassan Doosti, Nooshin Peyman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Health Literacy Status and Its Role in Interventions in Iran: A Systematic and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Shifts in Diabetes Health Literacy Policy and Practice in Australia-Promoting Organisational Health Literacy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elham Charoghchian KhorasaniHealth Education and Promotion, Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 13131-99137 Mashhad, Iran.
Seyedeh Belin Tavakoly SanyDepartment of Health Education and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 13131-99137 Mashhad, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-7891-4449
Hadi TehraniDepartment of Health Education and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 13131-99137 Mashhad, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8747-8717
Hassan DoostiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Macquarie University, 2109 Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0290-8122
Nooshin PeymanDepartment of Health Education and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 13131-99137 Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term organizational health literacy (OHL) is a new concept that emerged to address the challenge of predominantly in patients with limited health literacy (HL). There is no consensus on how OHL can improve HL activities and health outcomes in healthcare organizations. In this study, a systematic review of the literature was conducted to understand the evidence for the effectiveness of OHL and its health outcome, and the facilitators and barriers that influence the implementation of OHL. A literature search was done using six databases, the gray literature method and reference hand searches. Thirteen potentially articles with data on 1254 health organizations were included. Eight self-assessment tools and ten OHL attributes have been identified. Eleven quality-improvement characteristics and 15 key barriers were reviewed. Evidence on the effectiveness of HL tools provides best practices and recommendations to enhance OHL capacities. Results indicated that shifting to a comprehensive OHL would likely be a complex process because HL is not usually integrated into the healthcare organization's vision and strategic planning. Further development of OHL requires radical, simultaneous, and multiple changes. Thus, there is a need for the healthcare system to consider HL as an organizational priority, that is, be responsive.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth LiteracyOrganizationsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPilot Projectsbarriershealth literacyhealth-literate healthcare servicehealth outcomeorganizational health literacypublic healthquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID33081335
PMCPMC7589923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.