Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33081168›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Liver Cancer Incidence and Area-Level Geographic Disparities in Pennsylvania-A Geo-Additive Approach.

Angel G Ortiz, Daniel Wiese, Kristen A Sorice, Minhhuyen Nguyen, Evelyn T González, Kevin A Henry, Shannon M Lynch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Where Should the Cancer Control Interventions Target: A Geospatial Hotspot Analysis for Major Cancer Mortality 2018 to 2022 in the United States.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Effect of Neighborhood and Individual-Level Socioeconomic Factors on Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angel G OrtizCancer Prevention and Control, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
Daniel WieseGeography and Urban Studies, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Kristen A SoriceCancer Prevention and Control, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
Minhhuyen NguyenCancer Prevention and Control, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
Evelyn T GonzálezCancer Prevention and Control, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
Kevin A HenryCancer Prevention and Control, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
Shannon M LynchCancer Prevention and Control, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USTemple University · US

Funding

NIH HHS P30 CA00692720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many neighborhood socioeconomic index measures (nSES) that capture neighborhood deprivation exist but the impact of measure selection on liver cancer (LC) geographic disparities remains unclear. We introduce a Bayesian geoadditive modeling approach to identify clusters in Pennsylvania (PA) with higher than expected LC incidence rates, adjusted for individual-level factors (age, sex, race, diagnosis year) and compared them to models with 7 different nSES index measures to elucidate the impact of nSES and measure selection on LC geospatial variation. LC cases diagnosed from 2007-2014 were obtained from the PA Cancer Registry and linked to nSES measures from U.S. census at the Census Tract (CT) level. Relative Risks (RR) were estimated for each CT, adjusted for individual-level factors (baseline model). Each nSES measure was added to the baseline model and changes in model fit, geographic disparity and state-wide RR ranges were compared. All 7 nSES measures were strongly associated with high risk clusters. Tract-level RR ranges and geographic disparity from the baseline model were attenuated after adjustment for nSES measures. Depending on the nSES measure selected, up to 60% of the LC burden could be explained, suggesting methodologic evaluations of multiple nSES measures may be warranted in future studies to inform LC prevention efforts.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesLiver NeoplasmsSocial ClassAgedBayes TheoremFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPennsylvaniaResidence CharacteristicsRisk FactorsSocioeconomic Factorsdisparitiesgeospatialliver cancerneighborhood

Identifiers

PMID33081168
PMCPMC7588924
OpenAlexW3093311829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.