Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33081086›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Performance of Force-Field- and Machine Learning-Based Scoring Functions in Ranking MAO-B Protein-Inhibitor Complexes in Relevance to Developing Parkinson's Therapeutics.

Natarajan Arul Murugan, Charuvaka Muvva, Chitra Jeyarajpandian, Jeyaraman Jeyakanthan, Venkatesan Subramanian

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Investigation ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Natarajan Arul MuruganDepartment of Theoretical Chemistry and Biology, School of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0185-5724
Charuvaka MuvvaBiomAILS India Pvt Ltd., Hyderabad 500 090, India.
Chitra JeyarajpandianDepartment of Biotechnology, Dr. Umayal Ramanathan College for Women, Karaikudi 630 004, India.
Jeyaraman JeyakanthanDepartment of Bioinformatics, Alagappa University, Karaikudi 630 004, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4594-9610
Venkatesan SubramanianCentre for High Computing, CSIR-Central Leather Research Institute, Adyar, Chennai 600 020, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2463-545X
Alagappa University · INCentral Leather Research Institute · INKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoamine oxidase B (MAOB) is expressed in the mitochondrial membrane and has a key role in degrading various neurologically active amines such as benzylamine, phenethylamine and dopamine with the help of Flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) cofactor. The Parkinson's disease associated symptoms can be treated using inhibitors of MAO-B as the dopamine degradation can be reduced. Currently, many inhibitors are available having micromolar to nanomolar binding affinities. However, still there is demand for compounds with superior binding affinity and binding specificity with favorable pharmacokinetic properties for treating Parkinson's disease and computational screening methods can be majorly recruited for this. However, the accuracy of currently available force-field methods for ranking the inhibitors or lead drug-like compounds should be improved and novel methods for screening compounds need to be developed. We studied the performance of various force-field-based methods and data driven approaches in ranking about 3753 compounds having activity against the MAO-B target. The binding affinities computed using autodock and autodock-vina are shown to be non-reliable. The force-field-based MM-GBSA also under-performs. However, certain machine learning approaches, in particular KNN, are found to be superior, and we propose KNN as the most reliable approach for ranking the complexes to reasonable accuracy. Furthermore, all the employed machine learning approaches are also computationally less demanding.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAntiparkinson AgentsDrug DevelopmentHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMonoamine OxidaseMonoamine Oxidase InhibitorsProtein BindingAntiparkinson AgentsMonoamine OxidaseMonoamine Oxidase Inhibitorsbinding free energy calculationsmachine learning approachmolecular dockingmonoamine oxidase BParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID33081086
PMCPMC7589968
OpenAlexW3093163513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.