Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33080958›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Status and Novel Perspectives.

Piera Federico, Angelica Petrillo, Pasqualina Giordano, Davide Bosso, Antonietta Fabbrocini, Margaret Ottaviano, Mario Rosanova, Antonia Silvestri, Andrea Tufo, Antonio Cozzolino and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Exploration of the role ofOncology letters · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Piera FedericoMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0863-7546
Angelica PetrilloMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5489-5733
Pasqualina GiordanoMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Davide BossoMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Antonietta FabbrociniMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Margaret OttavianoMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Mario RosanovaMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Antonia SilvestriMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Andrea TufoSurgical Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Antonio CozzolinoGastroenterology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
Bruno DanieleMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a promising treatment for many kinds of cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The rationale for using ICIs in HCC is based on the immunogenic background of hepatitis and cirrhosis and on the observation of high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in this cancer. Promising data from phase I/II studies in advanced HCC, showing durable objective response rates (~20% in first- and second-line settings) and good safety profile, have led to phase III studies with ICIs as single agents or in combination therapy, both in first and second line setting. While the activity of immunotherapy agents as single agents seems to be limited to an "ill-defined" small subset of patients, the combination of the anti PD-L1 atezolizumab and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor bevacizumab revealed a benefit in the outcomes when compared to sorafenib in the first line. In addition, the activity and efficacy of the combinations between anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibody and other ICIs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or surgical and locoregional therapies, has also been investigated in clinical trials. In this review, we provide an overview of the role of ICIs in the management of HCC with a critical evaluation of the current status and future directions.

Indexed as

combination therapyhepatocellular carcinomaimmunotherapypredictive markers

Identifiers

PMID33080958
PMCPMC7603151
OpenAlexW3093069491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.