Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33080935›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Accuracy of the Zika IgM Antibody Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC Zika MAC-ELISA) for Diagnosis of Zika Virus Infection.

Moyra Machado Portilho, Laise de Moraes, Mariana Kikuti, Leile Camila Jacob Nascimento, Mitermayer Galvão Reis, Viviane Sampaio Boaventura, Ricardo Khouri, Guilherme Sousa Ribeiro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Dengue Dilemma: Navigating Cross-Reactivity and Immune Challenges.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Zika Virus Envelope Protein Domain III Produced inDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Moyra Machado PortilhoInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, BA 40296-710, Brazil.
Laise de MoraesInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, BA 40296-710, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9095-5860
Mariana KikutiInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, BA 40296-710, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8119-7236
Leile Camila Jacob NascimentoInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, BA 40296-710, Brazil.
Mitermayer Galvão ReisInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, BA 40296-710, Brazil.
Viviane Sampaio BoaventuraInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, BA 40296-710, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7241-6844
Ricardo KhouriInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, BA 40296-710, Brazil.
Guilherme Sousa RibeiroInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, BA 40296-710, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6798-2059
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 400830/2013-2Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 439967/2016-3Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 440891/2016-7Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 550160/2010-8Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.130746/2016-00Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia APP0044/2016Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia JCB0020/2013Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia PET0022/2016Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia PET0026/2013Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia PNX0010/2011Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia PPP0055/2011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serological diagnosis of Zika virus (ZIKV) infection is challenging because of antigenic cross-reactivity with dengue virus (DENV). This study evaluated the accuracy of the Zika IgM antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CDC Zika IgM MAC-ELISA) in differentiating between ZIKV and DENV infections. To determine sensitivity, we used acute- and convalescent-phase sera from 21 patients with RT-PCR-confirmed ZIKV infection. To determine specificity, we used acute- and convalescent-phase sera from 60 RT-PCR-confirmed dengue cases and sera from 23 blood donors. During the acute-phase of the illness, the assay presented a sensitivity of 12.5% (2/16) for samples collected 0-4 days post symptoms onset (DPSO), and of 75.0% (3/4) for samples collected 5-9 DPSO. During the convalescent-phase of the illness, the test sensitivity was 90.9% (10/11), 100% (2/2), and 0% (0/2) for samples obtained 12-102, 258-260, and 722-727 DPSO, respectively. Specificity for acute- and convalescent-phase samples from RT-PCR-confirmed dengue cases was 100% and 93.2%, respectively. Specificity for blood donor samples was 100%. The assay is an accurate method for Zika serological diagnosis and proved to be reliable for use during surveillance and outbreak investigations in settings where ZIKV and DENV cocirculate.

Indexed as

CDC Zika MAC-ELISAdiagnostic accuracyenzyme-linked immunosorbent assaysensitivity and specificityZika virus

Identifiers

PMID33080935
PMCPMC7603149
OpenAlexW3093237096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.