Article in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Sarita Mahtani-WilliamsResearch Institute of Wildlife Ecology, Vetmeduni Vienna, Savoyenstrasse 1, A-1160 Vienna, Austria.
William FultonResearch Institute of Wildlife Ecology, Vetmeduni Vienna, Savoyenstrasse 1, A-1160 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2803-5008
Amelie Desvars-LarriveResearch Institute of Wildlife Ecology, Vetmeduni Vienna, Savoyenstrasse 1, A-1160 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7671-696X
Sara LadoResearch Institute of Wildlife Ecology, Vetmeduni Vienna, Savoyenstrasse 1, A-1160 Vienna, Austria.
Jean Pierre ElbersResearch Institute of Wildlife Ecology, Vetmeduni Vienna, Savoyenstrasse 1, A-1160 Vienna, Austria.
Bálint HalpernMME Birdlife Hungary, Költő utca 21., H-1121 Budapest, Hungary.
Dávid HerczegLendület Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, Centre for Agricultural Research, Plant Protection Institute, Herman Ottó út 15., H-1022 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-5098-961X
Gergely BabocsayMME Birdlife Hungary, Költő utca 21., H-1121 Budapest, Hungary.
Boris LaušAssociation HYLA, Lipocac I., No. 7, C-10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Zoltán Tamás NagyIndependent Researcher, Hielscherstraße 25, D-13158 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8455-040X
Daniel JablonskiDepartment of Zoology, Comenius University in Bratislava, Ilkovičova 6, Mlynská Dolina, S-84215 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-5394-0114
Oleg KukushkinDepartment of Biodiversity Studies and Ecological Monitoring, T. I. Vyazemsky Karadag Scientific Station-Nature Reserve-Branch of Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Nauki Street 24, R-298188 Theodosia, Crimea.
Pablo Orozco-terWengelCardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, The Sir Martin Evans Building, Museum Ave, Cardiff CF103AX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7951-4148
Judit VörösDepartment of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Baross u. 13., H-1088 Budapest, Hungary.
Pamela Anna BurgerResearch Institute of Wildlife Ecology, Vetmeduni Vienna, Savoyenstrasse 1, A-1160 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6941-0257
Funding
Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29623
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Across the distribution of the Caspian whipsnake (
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Landscape Genomics of a Widely Distributed Snake, · full record | OpenQuestion