Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33080912›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

The Immune Microenvironment in Penile Cancer and Rationale for Immunotherapy.

Mohamed E Ahmed, Shayan Falasiri, Ali Hajiran, Jad Chahoud, Philippe E Spiess

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Penile cancer: Updates in systemic therapy.Asian journal of urology · 2022
    Review
  11. Tumor-associated immune cell infiltrate density in penile squamous cell carcinomas.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The peri- and intratumoral immune cell infiltrate and PD-L1 status in invasive squamous cell carcinomas of the penis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pembrolizumab as a promising intervention for advanced penile cancer.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  18. High quality palliative alternative for patients with advanced locoregional (CN3 Stage) penile cancer.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamed E AhmedDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0054-2710
Shayan FalasiriDepartment of Urology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8701-5146
Ali HajiranDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Jad ChahoudDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Philippe E SpiessDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5723-1972
Moffitt Cancer Center · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile cancer is an extremely rare malignancy that accounts for approximately 1% of cancer deaths in the United States every year. While primary penile cancer can be managed surgically, advanced and metastatic forms of the disease require more aggressive management plans with systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Despite the meaningful response to systemic treatments, the 2-year progression-free survival and disease-specific survival have shown disappointing results. Therefore, there is a crucial need for alternative treatment options with more favorable outcomes and a lower toxicity profile. There are currently extensive studies of tumor molecular biology and clinical trials with targeted molecular therapies, such as PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4. In this review, we will describe the penile cancer microenvironment, and summarize the rationale for immunotherapy in penile cancer patients.

Indexed as

immune infiltration patternspenile cancerProgrammed Death-1 Ligand (PD-L1)tumor microenvironment (TME)tumor mutational burden (TMB)

Identifiers

PMID33080912
PMCPMC7603091
OpenAlexW3093165277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.