Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33080802›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Translation and Validation of the Modified A-DIVA Scale to European Portuguese: Difficult Intravenous Access Scale for Adult Patients.

Paulo Santos-Costa, Liliana B Sousa, Fredericus H J van Loon, Anabela Salgueiro-Oliveira, Pedro Parreira, Margarida Vieira, João Graveto

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05935228 (Development and Evaluation of an Algorithm for Vascular Access Management - ALCOV Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05935228 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Development and Evaluation of an Algorithm for Vascular Access Management - ALCOV Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral Hospital, Nancy, FranceRan2023 to 2027Enrolled794ConditionsPeripheral Venous AccessArmsImplementation of the A-DIVA Scale, Implementation of the algorithm composed of the A-DIVA Scale and the new decision-making tree (the A-DIVA Tool) in the centers
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Striving for vessel health preservation through standardized assessment: a Letter to the EditorValidation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Venous International Assessment Scale and proposal of revisionUse of short peripheral intravenous catheters: characteristics, management, and outcomes worldwideRisk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter-related phlebitis in adult patientsPeripheral vascular catheter use in Latin America (the vascular study): a multinational cross-sectional studyGuidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measuresABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Index CalculationPsychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Propriedades psicométricas na avaliação de instrumentos: avaliação da confiabilidade e da validadeTranslation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Venous International Assessment Scale to European Portuguese.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paulo Santos-CostaHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, 3004-011 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0761-6548
Liliana B SousaHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, 3004-011 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8914-6975
Fredericus H J van LoonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3854-6976
Anabela Salgueiro-OliveiraHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, 3004-011 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8231-8279
Pedro ParreiraHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, 3004-011 Coimbra, Portugal.
Margarida VieiraInstituto de Ciências da Saúde (Porto), Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9439-2804
João GravetoHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, 3004-011 Coimbra, Portugal.
Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra · PTUniversidade Católica Portuguesa · PTRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: In Portugal, no accurate and reliable predictive instruments are known that could assist healthcare professionals in recognizing patients with difficult venous access. Thus, this study aimed to translate and validate the Modified A-DIVA scale to European Portuguese. (2) Methods: A methodological and cross-sectional study was conducted in two phases: translation of the Modified A-DIVA scale to European Portuguese following six stages proposed by Beaton and collaborators, and assessment of its psychometric properties in a non-probability sample of 100 patients who required peripheral intravenous catheterization in a Portuguese hospital. (3) Results: The European version of the Modified A-DIVA scale (A-DM scale) showed excellent inter-rater accordance scores, k = 0.593 (95% CI, 0.847 to 0.970),

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultCatheterization, PeripheralClinical Decision-MakingCross-Sectional StudiesDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansMalePortugalPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesWhite Peopleperipheral catheterizationrisk assessment for difficult intravenous accessscale psychometric validation

Identifiers

PMID33080802
PMCPMC7589933
OpenAlexW3093268476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.