ArticleMedicine2020
Efficacy and safety of acupoint injection therapy for allergic rhinitis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAllergic rhinitis (AR), characterized by nasal itching, sneezing, and congestion, is a common disorder of nose. In the United States, AR affects 10% to 20% of adults. The negative impact of the high prevalence of AR has caused a great economic burdens worldwide. Modern Western Medicine mainly treats AR with antihistamine drugs, glucocorticoids, allergic immunotherapy (AIT), but it seriously affects patients compliance because of its long course of treatment, high medical costs and side effect. And now, as an important mean of treating AR, acupoint injection has been widely used in clinics, and has achieved significant efficacy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The following databases will be searched for relevant information before July 2020: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI. MAJOR
resultsscores of Rhinitis Quality of Life (RQLQ), Rhinitis Total Symptom Scores (RTSS). Secondary results: levels of antigen-specific serum immunoglobulin E (IgE), total effective rate, adverse event. Data will be collected independently by 2 researchers, and the risk of bias in meta-analysis will be evaluated according to "Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions". All data analysis will be conducted using Review Manager V.5.3. and Stata V.12.0.
resultsThe curative effect and safety of acupoint injection treatment for AR patients will be evaluated systematically.
conclusionThe systematic review of this study will summarize the currently published evidence of acupoint injection treatment for AR to further guide its promotion and application. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The private information from individuals will not be published. This systematic review also will not involve endangering participant rights. Ethical approval is not required. The results may be published in a peer-reviewed journal or disseminated in relevant conferences.Open Science Framework (OSF) registration number: https://osf.io/fa9dq.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.