ArticleMedicine2020
Associations between a new day 4 embryo grading system and implantation rates in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to present a new day 4 (D4) embryo grading system for the assessment of embryos in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles.A new grading system (grades A-E) was modified from the 2011 ESHRE Istanbul Consensus for D4 embryos in FET cycles. In total, we retrospectively analyzed 5640 embryos with known implantation data after D4 transfer in FET cycles by using this proposed grading model.The transferred embryos exhibited a similar declining trend in implantation rates from the top grade A to the lowest grade E. The implantation rates of grade B and E embryos in the in vitro fertilization group were significantly higher than that in the intracytoplasmic sperm injection group (grade B: 41.82%, 35.23%, χ = 5.85, P < .05 and grade E: 18.53%, 14.81, χ = 76.86, P < .01, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that our proposed model predicted the implantation outcomes of all embryos (area under the ROC curve = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.63-0.66; P < .01).This study demonstrated that the new grading system provided by us turned out to be a useful tool in assisting embryo selection via embryo morphological changes, and D4 embryo transfer provided a simple and applicable method for a daily routine in FET cycles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.