ArticleMedicine2020
Surgical treatment and operation time in human immunodeficiency virus-negative cryptococcal meningitis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The consensus guideline of perioperative antiviral therapy for AIDS patients in China based on clinical practice.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Prediction of Intracranial Infection in Patients under External Ventricular Drainage and Neurological Intensive Care: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Cerebrospinal fluid shunting for the management of cryptococcal meningitis: a scoping review.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are still no unified guidelines of surgical treatment and timing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative patients with cryptococcal meningitis (CM).The clinical data and follow-up data were collected from HIV-negative CM patients in Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2009 to November 2018, and 42 patients who were treated with surgical intervention were enrolled in the present study. These 42 patients were divided into ventriculoatrial (VA) group, ventriculoperitoneal group, external ventricle drainage (EVD) group, hydrocephalus (HYC) group, non-HYC group, EVD group, and non-EVD group (VA/ ventriculoperitoneal) according to different surgical procedures. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 19.0, Chicago, IL).Signs of headache, fever, and loss of consciousness in the VA group were significantly improved compared with the EVD group at 1 week after operation (P < .05). The mortality rate of the VA group was significantly lower than that of the EVD group (P < .05). Moreover, male patients were more prone to have HYC (P < .05). Younger patients tended to develop HYC (P < .05). Cerebrospinal fluid sugar in the non-HYC group was significantly lower compared with the HYC group (P < .05). Time of CM-to-operation in the non-HYC group was markedly shorter compared with the HYC group (P < .01).VA procedure could be one of the first choices for the treatment of uncontrollable intracranial hypertension caused by CM. Severe uncontrollable headache, loss of consciousness, and cerebral hernia were indications of emergency surgery. Repeated headache, hearing impairment, and especially progressive loss of vision were indications of early surgery to avoid permanent damage to nerve functions of HIV-negative CM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.